CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›GWM ORA 5 vs BYD Atto 2
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GWM ORA 5 vs BYD Atto 2

Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 7 Sep 2026, price 7 Oct 2026

Winner
GWM ORA 5
GWM

GWM ORA 5

From $30,900

Body

SUV

Fuel type

Electric

Engine

Electric

Power

150kW

Economy

—

Safety

ANCAP: no data

Boot (seats up)

362L

65CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 65 vs 60

View full details
SpecGWMBYD
Price (RRP)$30,900$31,990
Fuel typeElectricElectric
Range (WLTP)435km345km
Battery58.3 kWh51.1 kWh
Power150kW130kW
0-100 km/h8s7.9s
Max DC Charge120kW82kW
10-80% Charge Time20 min40 min
Boot (seats up)362L380L
Towing750kg—
Warranty7yr / Unlimited6yr / 150k km
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LYes (6kW)No

Track the GWM ORA 5 & BYD Atto 2

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GWM ORA 5 starts from $30,900 before on-road costs, while the BYD Atto 2 opens at $31,990. That makes the GWM ORA 5 the more affordable entry point by $1,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $33,990 and $35,189 respectively.

Both models currently qualify for the electric-vehicle Fringe Benefits Tax exemption (battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold; battery-electric and under the $91,661 threshold), a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

GWM ORA 5

None open on our record

BYD Atto 2

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

58.3kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

56 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 120kW · 0–80%

29 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 120kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

How long to charge

45.1kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

43 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 82kW · 0–80%

33 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 82kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The GWM ORA 5 features a 14.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the BYD Atto 2 gets a 10.1-inch display and 8.8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM ORA 5 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the BYD Atto 2. The BYD Atto 2 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GWM ORA 5 uses a Electric producing 150kW and 260Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The BYD Atto 2 responds with a Electric making 130kW and 290Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The GWM ORA 5 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 130kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Atto 2 is 0.1s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 58.3kWh (GWM ORA 5) vs 51.1kWh (BYD Atto 2), giving WLTP ranges of 435km and 345km. DC fast charging peaks at 120kW (GWM ORA 5) vs 82kW (BYD Atto 2).

Space & Comfort

The GWM ORA 5 measures 4,471mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 161mm longer than the BYD Atto 2 at 4,310mm (2,620mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM ORA 5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 362L in the GWM ORA 5 and 380L in the BYD Atto 2, giving the BYD Atto 2 a 18L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.5m to 10.9m

TightestBYD Atto 2 DynamicTightest turn at 10.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
BYD Atto 2 Dynamic
10.5mTighter
Best
GWM ORA 5 Lux
10.9m
Worst
GWM ORA 5 Lux
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
BYD Atto 2 Dynamic
10.5m · Good

Based on 10.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestBYD Atto 2Tightest turn at 10.5m, needs the least road to swing around
GWM ORA 510.9 m
Good△ 3-point
BYD Atto 2Tightest10.5 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA 5) vs 6 years / 150,000km (BYD Atto 2). The GWM ORA 5 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GWM ORA 5 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the BYD Atto 2 if: You need more boot space, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

GWM ORA 5: Top CarSorted Score, 65 vs 60

The GWM ORA 5 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (65 vs 60), taking 9 of 11 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: technology (GWM ORA 5 ahead by 16), safety (GWM ORA 5 ahead by 12), practicality (GWM ORA 5 ahead by 6). The GWM ORA 5 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GWM ORA 5 and BYD Atto 2?

The GWM ORA 5 is the cheapest at $30,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Atto 2 by $1,090.

Which has the longest driving range?

The GWM ORA 5 has the most range at 435km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The GWM ORA 5 accepts the highest DC charging at up to 120kW.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of GWM ORA 5 and BYD Atto 2 carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The BYD Atto 2 has the largest boot at 380L with the seats up (1,320L with the seats folded).

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM ORA 5 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM ORA 5 makes the most power at 150kW. The BYD Atto 2 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best electric SUVs