GWM ORA vs Suzuki Swift
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the GWM ORA & Suzuki Swift
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The GWM ORA starts from $31,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Swift opens at $23,990. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $8,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $35,189 and $26,389 respectively.
The GWM ORA qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Suzuki Swift, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Safety Rundown
The GWM ORA holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 3 stars for the Suzuki Swift. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the GWM ORA and 67% for the Suzuki Swift.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM ORA, against 4 on the Suzuki Swift.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the GWM ORA and 6 in the Suzuki Swift.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
59kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 80kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 80kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The GWM ORA features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Swift gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM ORA stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the GWM ORA gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Suzuki Swift offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The GWM ORA uses a Electric producing 126kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.4 seconds.
The Suzuki Swift responds with a Petrol making 59.6kW and 109Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.4 seconds.
The GWM ORA has the clear power advantage at 126kW vs 59.6kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM ORA is 4.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The GWM ORA measures 4,235mm long on a 2,650mm wheelbase, 375mm longer than the Suzuki Swift at 3,860mm (2,450mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM ORA generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 228L in the GWM ORA and 267L in the Suzuki Swift, giving the Suzuki Swift a 39L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.8m to 11.2m
Based on 11.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 9.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift). The GWM ORA has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the GWM ORA if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM ORA takes 5 of 7 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Suzuki Swift has a clear edge. The GWM ORA adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, GWM ORA and Suzuki Swift?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $23,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM ORA by $8,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The GWM ORA has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Suzuki Swift has the largest boot at 267L.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM ORA has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The GWM ORA makes the most power at 126kW. The GWM ORA is quickest to 100km/h in 8.4s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
