CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsHyundai Kona Electric vs Mazda CX-60
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Hyundai Kona Electric vs Mazda CX-60

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecHyundaiMazda
Price (RRP)$40,500$44,240
Range (WLTP)395km
Battery48.4 kWh
Power99kW138kW
0-100 km/h9.9s7.4s
Max DC Charge75kW
10-80% Charge Time47 min
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km
Boot Space361L570L
Towing1,300kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric starts from $40,500 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Hyundai Kona Electric the more affordable entry point by $3,740.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $44,550 and $48,664 respectively.

The Hyundai Kona Electric qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-60, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Hyundai Kona Electric and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 80% for the Hyundai Kona Electric and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Hyundai Kona Electric packs more ADAS features with 5 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 3 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 6 in the Mazda CX-60.

Feature Showdown

The Hyundai Kona Electric features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Hyundai Kona Electric stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and heated front seats that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Hyundai Kona Electric uses a Electric producing 99kW and 255Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 99kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Hyundai Kona Electric measures 4,350mm long on a 2,660mm wheelbase, 395mm shorter than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,745mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 361L in the Hyundai Kona Electric and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 209L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,300kg. That 700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.4m

Hyundai Kona Electric Standard Range 99kW
10.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4m
Worst
Hyundai Kona Electric
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Hyundai Kona Electric) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Hyundai Kona Electric if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Hyundai's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Hyundai Kona Electric and Mazda CX-60?

The Hyundai Kona Electric is the cheapest at $40,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-60 by $3,740.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 6.7L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Hyundai Kona Electric and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-60 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-60 makes the most power at 138kW. The Mazda CX-60 is quickest to 100km/h in 7.4s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs