CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Gladiator vs Mazda BT-50
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Gladiator vs Mazda BT-50

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJeepMazda
Price (RRP)$84,990$36,400
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power209kW120kW
0-100 km/h8s10.9s
Fuel Economy12.4 L/100km6.9 L/100km
Towing2,721kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Jeep Gladiator & Mazda BT-50

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Jeep Gladiator starts from $84,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda BT-50 opens at $36,400. That makes the Mazda BT-50 the more affordable entry point by $48,590.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $93,489 and $40,040 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda BT-50 by roughly $7,835 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Jeep Gladiator features a 8.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Jeep Gladiator stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and Alpine audio that you will not find on the Mazda BT-50. The Mazda BT-50 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Jeep Gladiator gets leather upholstery while the Mazda BT-50 offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Gladiator uses a Petrol V6 Pentastar w/ ESS producing 209kW and 347Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8 seconds.

The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The Jeep Gladiator has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Jeep Gladiator is 2.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Gladiator measures 5,591mm long on a 3,488mm wheelbase, 271mm longer than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Jeep Gladiator generally means more rear legroom.

0

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 2,721kg. That 779kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m to 13.6m

TightestMazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2Tightest turn at 12.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5mTighter
Best
Jeep Gladiator Rubicon
13.6m
Worst
Jeep Gladiator Rubicon
13.6m · Large

Based on 13.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestMazda BT-50Tightest turn at 12.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Jeep Gladiator13.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Mazda BT-50Tightest12.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,534/year for the Jeep Gladiator and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $1,567 annual difference in favour of the Mazda BT-50.

Estimated annual total: $3,534 (Jeep Gladiator) vs $1,967 (Mazda BT-50). The Mazda BT-50 saves you roughly $1,567 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Gladiator) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Jeep Gladiator)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Gladiator if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda BT-50 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda BT-50 will save you roughly $1,567 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Gladiator and Mazda BT-50?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Gladiator by $48,590.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda BT-50 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Jeep Gladiator makes the most power at 209kW. The Jeep Gladiator is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia