CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsKGM Musso EV vs MINI Aceman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso EV vs MINI Aceman

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecKGMMINI
Price (RRP)$60,000$60,990
Range (WLTP)420km352km
Battery80.6 kWh54.2 kWh
Power152kW160kW
0-100 km/h10.9s7.1s
Max DC Charge300kW95kW
10-80% Charge Time36 min31 min
Boot Space532L300L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The KGM Musso EV starts from $60,000 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the KGM Musso EV the more affordable entry point by $990.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,000 and $67,089 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

Both the KGM Musso EV and MINI Aceman hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 7 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the KGM Musso EV and 9 in the MINI Aceman. The KGM Musso EV adds a 360-degree camera that the MINI Aceman misses.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso EV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso EV stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats and V2L that you will not find on the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso EV gets leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso EV uses a Electric producing 152kW and 339Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.

The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 152kW. In the real-world sprint, the MINI Aceman is 3.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 420km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 300kW (KGM Musso EV) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso EV measures 5,160mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 1087mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 532L in the KGM Musso EV and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the KGM Musso EV a 232L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 12.2m

MINI Aceman SE Favoured
10.6mTighter
Best
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m
Worst
KGM Musso EV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
MINI Aceman
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MINI Aceman if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 8 of 11 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the KGM Musso EV has a clear edge. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, KGM Musso EV and MINI Aceman?

The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $990.

Which has the longest driving range?

The KGM Musso EV has the most range at 420km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The KGM Musso EV accepts the highest DC charging at up to 300kW.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — KGM Musso EV and MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso EV has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso EV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The MINI Aceman is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All SUVs