KGM Musso EV vs MINI Aceman
Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the KGM Musso EV & MINI Aceman
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Musso EV starts from $60,000 before on-road costs, while the MINI Aceman opens at $60,990. That makes the KGM Musso EV the more affordable entry point by $990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,000 and $67,089 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
80.6kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 300kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
How long to charge
49.2kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 95kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 95kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Musso EV features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the MINI Aceman gets a 9.4-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Musso EV stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats and V2L that you will not find on the MINI Aceman. The MINI Aceman counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof and Harman Kardon audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the KGM Musso EV gets leather upholstery while the MINI Aceman offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The KGM Musso EV uses a Electric producing 152kW and 339Nm of torque, sent through a 1-speed to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.
The MINI Aceman responds with a Electric making 160kW and 330Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.
The MINI Aceman has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 152kW. In the real-world sprint, the MINI Aceman is 3.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV) vs 54.2kWh (MINI Aceman), giving WLTP ranges of 420km and 352km. DC fast charging peaks at 300kW (KGM Musso EV) vs 95kW (MINI Aceman).
Space & Comfort
The KGM Musso EV measures 5,160mm long on a 3,150mm wheelbase, 1087mm longer than the MINI Aceman at 4,073mm (2,606mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 532L in the KGM Musso EV and 300L in the MINI Aceman, giving the KGM Musso EV a 232L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.1m to 12.2m
Based on 12.2m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV) vs 5 years / 999,999km (MINI Aceman). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MINI Aceman if: You prioritise performance, or prefer MINI's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The KGM Musso EV takes 8 of 11 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the KGM Musso EV has a clear edge. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Musso EV and MINI Aceman?
The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MINI Aceman by $990.
Which has the longest driving range?
The KGM Musso EV has the most range at 420km (WLTP).
Which charges fastest?
The KGM Musso EV accepts the highest DC charging at up to 300kW.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MINI Aceman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The KGM Musso EV has the largest boot at 532L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Musso EV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The MINI Aceman makes the most power at 160kW. The MINI Aceman is quickest to 100km/h in 7.1s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
