KGM Rexton vs Peugeot 3008
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The KGM Rexton starts from $50,000 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot 3008 opens at $52,990. That makes the KGM Rexton the more affordable entry point by $2,990.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $55,000 and $58,289 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Peugeot 3008 by roughly $3,990 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The KGM Rexton holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Peugeot 3008.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 6 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the KGM Rexton and 6 in the Peugeot 3008.
Feature Showdown
The KGM Rexton features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 3008 gets a 21-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The KGM Rexton stands out with ambient lighting that you will not find on the Peugeot 3008. The Peugeot 3008 counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the KGM Rexton gets leather upholstery while the Peugeot 3008 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The KGM Rexton uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 149kW and 441Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 11.5 seconds.
The Peugeot 3008 responds with a Hybrid making 100kW and 230Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The KGM Rexton has the clear power advantage at 149kW vs 100kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 3008 is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The KGM Rexton measures 4,850mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 308mm longer than the Peugeot 3008 at 4,542mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Rexton generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 236L in the KGM Rexton and 520L in the Peugeot 3008, giving the Peugeot 3008 a 284L advantage. The KGM Rexton seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the KGM Rexton leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,200kg. That 2,300kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.4m to 11.6m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 11.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,480/year for the KGM Rexton and $1,682/year for the Peugeot 3008. That is a $798 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 3008.
Estimated annual total: $2,480 (KGM Rexton) vs $1,682 (Peugeot 3008). The Peugeot 3008 saves you roughly $798 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Rexton) vs 5 years / 200,000km (Peugeot 3008). The KGM Rexton has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the KGM Rexton if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot 3008 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The KGM Rexton takes 5 of 8 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Peugeot 3008 will save you roughly $798 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 3008 has a clear edge. The KGM Rexton adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, KGM Rexton and Peugeot 3008?
The KGM Rexton is the cheapest at $50,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Peugeot 3008 by $2,990.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Peugeot 3008 uses the least fuel at 5.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The KGM Rexton has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Peugeot 3008 has the largest boot at 520L.
Which can tow the most?
The KGM Rexton has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The KGM Rexton has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The KGM Rexton makes the most power at 149kW. The Peugeot 3008 is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
