Kia Seltos vs Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Kia Seltos starts from $31,250 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid opens at $29,990. That makes the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid the more affordable entry point by $1,260.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $34,375 and $32,989 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid by roughly $2,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Kia Seltos and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Kia Seltos and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Kia Seltos and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Feature Showdown
The Kia Seltos features a 8-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets a 10.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Kia Seltos stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Kia Seltos uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.2 seconds.
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 + HEV making 71kW and 120Nm, paired to a auto driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.5 seconds.
The Kia Seltos has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 71kW. In the real-world sprint, the Kia Seltos is 1.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Kia Seltos measures 4,385mm long on a 2,630mm wheelbase, 55mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid at 4,330mm (2,604mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Seltos generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 312L in the Kia Seltos and 358L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a 46L advantage.
For towing, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m to 11.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Kia Seltos and $1,539/year for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid. That is a $428 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Kia Seltos) vs $1,539 (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid saves you roughly $428 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Seltos) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Kia Seltos if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid will save you roughly $428 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Kia Seltos and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid is the cheapest at $29,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Kia Seltos by $1,260.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses the least fuel at 5.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Kia Seltos and Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the largest boot at 358L.
Which can tow the most?
The Kia Seltos has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Kia Seltos makes the most power at 110kW. The Kia Seltos is quickest to 100km/h in 9.2s.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
