Land Rover Range Rover Sport vs Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Land Rover Range Rover Sport
From $146,799
SUV
Diesel
3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid
183kW
7.3 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
835L

Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV
From $134,900
SUV
Electric
Electric
180kW
—
5★ ANCAP
520L
Track the Land Rover Range Rover Sport & Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport starts from $146,799 before on-road costs, while the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV opens at $134,900. That makes the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV the more affordable entry point by $11,899.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $161,479 and $148,390 respectively.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Land Rover Range Rover Sport, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Safety Rundown
Both the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 85% for the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 87% for the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 8 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, against 7 on the Land Rover Range Rover Sport.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
90.6kWh usablePublic DC
50kW charger · 0–80%
Ultra-rapid DC
up to 170kW · 0–80%
Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 170kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport features a 13.1-inch touchscreen paired with a 13.7-inch digital dash, while the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV gets a 12.8-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport stands out with Meridian audio that you will not find on the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV counters with head-up display, panoramic roof and Burmester audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Land Rover Range Rover Sport gets leather upholstery while the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV offers artico man-made leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 4-zone in the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV.
Drivetrain
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses a 3.0 i6 Diesel Mild Hybrid producing 183kW and 600Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.7 seconds.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV responds with a Electric making 180kW and 550Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 180kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is 0.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport measures 4,946mm long on a 2,997mm wheelbase, 83mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV at 4,863mm (3,030mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 835L in the Land Rover Range Rover Sport and 520L in the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, giving the Land Rover Range Rover Sport a 315L advantage.
For towing, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 2,750kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.0m to 12.3m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Land Rover Range Rover Sport) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: —5yr (Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV).
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Land Rover Range Rover Sport if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Land Rover's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Land Rover Range Rover Sport has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV?
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is the cheapest at $134,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Land Rover Range Rover Sport by $11,899.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport uses the least fuel at 7.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Land Rover Range Rover Sport and Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the largest boot at 835L.
Which can tow the most?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Land Rover Range Rover Sport makes the most power at 183kW. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is quickest to 100km/h in 7.3s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!











