CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda BT-50 vs Peugeot 508
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda BT-50 vs Peugeot 508

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaPeugeot
Price (RRP)$36,400TBC
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power120kW165kW
0-100 km/h10.9s8.1s
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km5.5 L/100km
Boot Space487L
Towing3,500kg1,600kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Mazda BT-50 & Peugeot 508

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda BT-50 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 4.2-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot 508 gets a 10-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 508 counters with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate that the Mazda BT-50 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda BT-50 uses a Diesel producing 120kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The Peugeot 508 responds with a 1.6L PureTech turbo petrol making 165kW and 300Nm, paired to a 8-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.1 seconds.

The Peugeot 508 has the clear power advantage at 165kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 508 is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda BT-50 measures 5,320mm long on a 3,125mm wheelbase, 570mm longer than the Peugeot 508 at 4,750mm (2,800mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 1,900kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5m diameter

Large

Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m
Mazda BT-50 XS SC 4x2
12.5m · Large

Based on 12.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.5 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
Mazda BT-50 Turning circle · Ø 12.5 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 10.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50 and $1,568/year for the Peugeot 508. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 508.

Estimated annual total: $1,967 (Mazda BT-50) vs $1,568 (Peugeot 508). The Peugeot 508 saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot 508). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot 508 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot 508 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Peugeot 508 will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda BT-50 and Peugeot 508?

The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 508 uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Peugeot 508 makes the most power at 165kW. The Peugeot 508 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.1s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Fastbacks · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars