CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsPeugeot 508 vs Toyota Kluger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Peugeot 508 vs Toyota Kluger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecPeugeotToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$62,410
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power165kW184kW
0-100 km/h8.1s7.9s
Fuel Economy5.5 L/100km5.6 L/100km
Boot Space487L241L
Towing1,600kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Peugeot 508 & Toyota Kluger

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Peugeot 508 features a 10-inch touchscreen, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Peugeot 508 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota Kluger. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Peugeot 508 uses a 1.6L PureTech turbo petrol producing 165kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.1 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 165kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota Kluger is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Peugeot 508 measures 4,750mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 216mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Kluger generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 487L in the Peugeot 508 and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Peugeot 508 a 246L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Toyota Kluger leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4 m Ø

Average

9.0 m road
Toyota Kluger Turning circle · Ø 11.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 9.8 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

1.9 m wide: fits with room

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Peugeot 508 and $1,596/year for the Toyota Kluger. That is a $28 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 508.

Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Peugeot 508) vs $1,596 (Toyota Kluger). The Peugeot 508 saves you roughly $28 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot 508) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Peugeot 508 if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota Kluger takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Peugeot 508 will save you roughly $28 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Peugeot 508 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Peugeot 508 and Toyota Kluger?

The Toyota Kluger is the cheapest at $62,410 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Peugeot 508 uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot 508 has the largest boot at 487L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Kluger has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Kluger makes the most power at 184kW. The Toyota Kluger is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Fastbacks · All SUVs · Best family cars · Best hybrid cars