CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-60 vs Renault Symbioz
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-60 vs Renault Symbioz

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaRenault
Price (RRP)$44,240$44,990
Power138kW70kW
0-100 km/h7.4s10.6s
Fuel Economy6.7 L/100km4.6 L/100km
Boot Space570L434L
Towing2,000kg750kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-60 starts from $44,240 before on-road costs, while the Renault Symbioz opens at $44,990. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,664 and $49,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Renault Symbioz by roughly $2,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-60 and Renault Symbioz hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 3 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Renault Symbioz gets a 10.4-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-60 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Renault Symbioz. The Renault Symbioz counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Renault Symbioz responds with a Inline 4 making 70kW and 149Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.6 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 has the clear power advantage at 138kW vs 70kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 3.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,745mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 332mm longer than the Renault Symbioz at 4,413mm (2,638mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-60 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 434L in the Renault Symbioz, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 136L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-60 leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 1,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.4m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-60 G25 Pure
11.4m
Mazda CX-60
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $1,311/year for the Renault Symbioz. That is a $599 annual difference in favour of the Renault Symbioz.

Estimated annual total: $1,910 (Mazda CX-60) vs $1,311 (Renault Symbioz). The Renault Symbioz saves you roughly $599 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Renault Symbioz). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Renault Symbioz if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Renault's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-60 takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Renault Symbioz will save you roughly $599 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs