Mazda CX-6e vs Peugeot e-2008
Two electric SUVs go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-6e starts from $59,106 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot e-2008 opens at $59,990. That makes the Mazda CX-6e the more affordable entry point by $884.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,017 and $65,989 respectively.
Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Mazda CX-6e stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof and ventilated seats that you will not find on the Peugeot e-2008. The Peugeot e-2008 counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-6e uses a Electric producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.
The Peugeot e-2008 responds with a Electric Motor making 115kW and 260Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.
The Mazda CX-6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Battery: 77.9kWh (Mazda CX-6e) vs 54kWh (Peugeot e-2008), giving WLTP ranges of 484km and 406km. DC fast charging peaks at 150kW (Mazda CX-6e) vs 100kW (Peugeot e-2008).
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-6e measures 4,850mm long on a 2,902mm wheelbase, 550mm longer than the Peugeot e-2008 at 4,300mm (2,605mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-6e generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 468L in the Mazda CX-6e and 405L in the Peugeot e-2008, giving the Mazda CX-6e a 63L advantage.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-6e) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot e-2008). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Peugeot e-2008 if: You or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Mazda CX-6e takes 7 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-6e has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
