CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-70 vs Polestar 4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-70 vs Polestar 4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaPolestar
Price (RRP)$76,720$78,500
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)620km
Battery100 kWh
Power254kW200kW
0-100 km/h6.8s7.1s
Max DC Charge200kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy8.1 L/100km
Boot Space598L526L
Towing2,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-70 & Polestar 4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-70 starts from $76,720 before on-road costs, while the Polestar 4 opens at $78,500. That makes the Mazda CX-70 the more affordable entry point by $1,780.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,392 and $86,350 respectively.

The Polestar 4 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-70, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

100kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 36m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 200kW · 0–80%

30 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (11kW AC, 200kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-70 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Polestar 4 gets a 15.4-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments.

The Mazda CX-70 stands out with head-up display and Bose audio that you will not find on the Polestar 4. The Polestar 4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, ventilated seats, power tailgate, Bowers & Wilkins audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-70 gets leather upholstery while the Polestar 4 offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-70 and 2-zone in the Polestar 4.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-70 uses a Petrol producing 254kW and 500Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.8 seconds.

The Polestar 4 responds with a Electric Motor making 200kW and 343Nm, paired to a single-speed fixed gear driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.1 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 200kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-70 is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-70 measures 5,120mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 280mm longer than the Polestar 4 at 4,840mm (2,999mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 598L in the Mazda CX-70 and 526L in the Polestar 4, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 72L advantage.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 11.8m

TightestPolestar 4 Long Range Single MotorTightest turn at 11.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Polestar 4 Long Range Single Motor
11.6mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
Worst
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Polestar 4 Long Range Single Motor
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPolestar 4Tightest turn at 11.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Mazda CX-7011.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Polestar 4Tightest11.6 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Polestar 4). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Polestar 4 if: You or prefer Polestar's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 5 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-70 and Polestar 4?

The Mazda CX-70 is the cheapest at $76,720 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Polestar 4 by $1,780.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-70 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Polestar 4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW. The Mazda CX-70 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best electric SUVs