CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs GWM Haval H6GT
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs GWM Haval H6GT

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaGWM
Price (RRP)$64,490$44,990
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power209kW150kW
0-100 km/h9s8.5s
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km8.4 L/100km
Boot Space258L471L
Towing2,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Mazda CX-80 & GWM Haval H6GT

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6GT opens at $44,990. That makes the GWM Haval H6GT the more affordable entry point by $19,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $49,489 respectively.

Safety Rundown

Both the Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 90% for the GWM Haval H6GT.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The GWM Haval H6GT packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Mazda CX-80.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT. The GWM Haval H6GT adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-80 misses.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval H6GT gets a 12.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GWM Haval H6GT counters with head-up display, wireless charging and heated front seats that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the GWM Haval H6GT offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the GWM Haval H6GT.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The GWM Haval H6GT responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 320Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H6GT is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 263mm longer than the GWM Haval H6GT at 4,727mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 471L in the GWM Haval H6GT, giving the GWM Haval H6GT a 213L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m to 12.0m

Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.6mTighter
Best
GWM Haval H6GT Ultra
12.0m
Worst
Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM Haval H6GT Ultra
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $2,394/year for the GWM Haval H6GT.

Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $2,394 (GWM Haval H6GT). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM Haval H6GT takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6GT has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT?

The GWM Haval H6GT is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $19,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The GWM Haval H6GT has the largest boot at 471L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best hybrid cars · Best mid-size SUVs