Mazda CX-80 vs GWM Haval H6GT
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Mazda CX-80 & GWM Haval H6GT
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the GWM Haval H6GT opens at $44,990. That makes the GWM Haval H6GT the more affordable entry point by $19,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $49,489 respectively.
Safety Rundown
Both the Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the Mazda CX-80 and 88% for the GWM Haval H6GT.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the GWM Haval H6GT, against 6 on the Mazda CX-80.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Mazda CX-80 and 6 in the GWM Haval H6GT.
Feature Showdown
The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GWM Haval H6GT gets a 12.3-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The GWM Haval H6GT counters with head-up display, wireless charging and heated front seats that the Mazda CX-80 does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the GWM Haval H6GT offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Mazda CX-80 and 2-zone in the GWM Haval H6GT.
Drivetrain
The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.
The GWM Haval H6GT responds with a Petrol making 150kW and 320Nm, paired to a auto driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.5 seconds.
The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 150kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM Haval H6GT is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 263mm longer than the GWM Haval H6GT at 4,727mm (2,738mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 392L in the GWM Haval H6GT, giving the GWM Haval H6GT a 134L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the Mazda CX-80 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
11.6m to 12.0m
Based on 11.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the Mazda CX-80 and $2,394/year for the GWM Haval H6GT.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (Mazda CX-80) vs $2,394 (GWM Haval H6GT). Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM Haval H6GT). The GWM Haval H6GT has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the GWM Haval H6GT if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The GWM Haval H6GT takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the GWM Haval H6GT has a clear edge. The GWM Haval H6GT adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT?
The GWM Haval H6GT is the cheapest at $44,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $19,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 and GWM Haval H6GT all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the largest boot at 392L.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The GWM Haval H6GT has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW. The GWM Haval H6GT is quickest to 100km/h in 8.5s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
