CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda CX-80 vs Peugeot e-2008
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda CX-80 vs Peugeot e-2008

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaPeugeot
Price (RRP)$64,490$59,990
Range (WLTP)406km
Battery54 kWh
Power209kW115kW
0-100 km/h9s9s
Max DC Charge100kW
10-80% Charge Time25 min
Fuel Economy8.4 L/100km
Boot Space258L405L
Towing2,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Mazda CX-80 starts from $64,490 before on-road costs, while the Peugeot e-2008 opens at $59,990. That makes the Peugeot e-2008 the more affordable entry point by $4,500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $70,939 and $65,989 respectively.

The Peugeot e-2008 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Mazda CX-80, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda CX-80 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Peugeot e-2008 gets a 10-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-80 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the Peugeot e-2008. The Peugeot e-2008 counters with Apple CarPlay and head-up display. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-80 gets cloth upholstery while the Peugeot e-2008 offers synthetic leather.

Drivetrain

The Mazda CX-80 uses a Petrol producing 209kW and 450Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9 seconds.

The Peugeot e-2008 responds with a Electric Motor making 115kW and 260Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9 seconds.

The Mazda CX-80 has the clear power advantage at 209kW vs 115kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda CX-80 measures 4,990mm long on a 3,120mm wheelbase, 690mm longer than the Peugeot e-2008 at 4,300mm (2,605mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-80 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 258L in the Mazda CX-80 and 405L in the Peugeot e-2008, giving the Peugeot e-2008 a 147L advantage. The Mazda CX-80 seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.6m diameter

Average

Mazda CX-80 G40e Pure
11.6m
Mazda CX-80
11.6m · Average

Based on 11.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-80) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot e-2008). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda CX-80 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Peugeot e-2008 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Peugeot e-2008 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Peugeot e-2008 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda CX-80 and Peugeot e-2008?

The Peugeot e-2008 is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Mazda CX-80 by $4,500.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-80 uses the least fuel at 8.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Mazda CX-80 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Peugeot e-2008 has the largest boot at 405L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-80 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-80 makes the most power at 209kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs