CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Porsche Panamera
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance vs Porsche Panamera

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Sedans compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMercedes-BenzPorsche
Price (RRP)$189,900$227,000
Fuel typePlug-in HybridPetrol
Battery6.1 kWh
Electric range15km
Power500kW260kW
0-100 km/h3.4s5.3s
Fuel Economy6.1 kWh/100km9.5 L/100km
Boot Space280L494L
Warranty5yr / Unlimited3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance & Porsche Panamera

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance starts from $189,900 before on-road costs, while the Porsche Panamera opens at $227,000. That makes the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance the more affordable entry point by $37,100.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $208,890 and $249,700 respectively.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Porsche Panamera, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance by roughly $12,075 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

6.1kWh usable

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance features a 11.9-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Porsche Panamera gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.6-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and Burmester audio that you will not find on the Porsche Panamera. The Porsche Panamera counters with ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance gets nappa leather upholstery while the Porsche Panamera offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses a Hybrid producing 500kW and 1020Nm of torque, sent through a 9-speed auto to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 3.4 seconds.

The Porsche Panamera responds with a Petrol making 260kW and 500Nm, paired to a 8-speed pdk driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 5.3 seconds.

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the clear power advantage at 500kW vs 260kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is 1.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance measures 4,842mm long on a 2,865mm wheelbase, 210mm shorter than the Porsche Panamera at 5,052mm (2,950mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Porsche Panamera generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 280L in the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and 494L in the Porsche Panamera, giving the Porsche Panamera a 214L advantage. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance seats 5 vs 4.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.9m to 12.1m

TightestPorsche PanameraTightest turn at 11.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Porsche Panamera
11.9mTighter
Best
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m
Worst
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance Sedan
12.1m · Large

Based on 12.1m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Porsche Panamera
11.9m · Average

Based on 11.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestPorsche PanameraTightest turn at 11.9m, needs the least road to swing around
Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance12.1 m
Large△ 3-point
Porsche PanameraTightest11.9 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $293/year for the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and $2,708/year for the Porsche Panamera. That is a $2,415 annual difference in favour of the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance.

Estimated annual total: $293 (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs $2,708 (Porsche Panamera). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance saves you roughly $2,415 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Porsche Panamera). The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Mercedes-Benz's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Porsche Panamera if: You need more boot space, or prefer Porsche's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance will save you roughly $2,415 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Porsche Panamera has a clear edge. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Porsche Panamera?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is the cheapest at $189,900 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Porsche Panamera by $37,100.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance and Porsche Panamera carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Porsche Panamera has the largest boot at 494L.

Which has the best warranty?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance makes the most power at 500kW. The Mercedes-Benz AMG C63 S E Performance is quickest to 100km/h in 3.4s.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · Best electric cars · Best family cars