CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG HS vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG HS vs Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGChery
Price (RRP)$33,990$34,990
Range (WLTP)93km
Battery18.4 kWh
Power125kW105kW
0-100 km/h8.6s9.5s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km1.4 kWh/100km
Boot Space507L475L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty10yr / 250k km7yr / unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The MG HS starts from $33,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid opens at $34,990. That makes the MG HS the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $37,389 and $38,489 respectively.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The MG HS, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by roughly $8,930 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the MG HS and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 92% for the MG HS and 82% for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the MG HS.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG HS and 6 in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Feature Showdown

The MG HS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The MG HS stands out with Apple CarPlay, panoramic roof and power tailgate that you will not find on the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The MG HS uses a Petrol producing 125kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.6 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid responds with a Petrol I4 Turbo + PHEV making 105kW and 215Nm, paired to a 1-speed dedicated hybrid transmission (dht) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.5 seconds.

The MG HS has the clear power advantage at 125kW vs 105kW. In the real-world sprint, the MG HS is 0.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG HS measures 4,670mm long on a 2,765mm wheelbase, 135mm longer than the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid at 4,535mm (2,653mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG HS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 507L in the MG HS and 475L in the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid, giving the MG HS a 32L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.2m

MG HS Vibe
11.0mTighter
Best
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid Urban
11.2m
Worst
MG HS
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the MG HS and $67/year for the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid. That is a $1,786 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (MG HS) vs $67 (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $1,786 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG HS) vs 7 years (Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid). The MG HS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG HS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG HS takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $1,786 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG HS has a clear edge. The MG HS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG HS and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid?

The MG HS is the cheapest at $33,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — MG HS and Chery Tiggo 7 Super Hybrid all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The MG HS has the largest boot at 507L.

Which can tow the most?

The MG HS has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG HS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG HS makes the most power at 125kW. The MG HS is quickest to 100km/h in 8.6s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs