MG QS vs Mazda CX-60
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
MG QS
From $46,990
SUV
Petrol
2.0L Turbo Petrol
153kW
8.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
203L
Mazda CX-60
From $44,240
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
138kW
7.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
570L
Track the MG QS & Mazda CX-60
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG QS starts from $46,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $2,750.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,689 and $48,664 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-60 by roughly $1,280 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the MG QS and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the MG QS and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG QS packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-60.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the MG QS and 7 in the Mazda CX-60. The MG QS adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.
Feature Showdown
The MG QS features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The MG QS stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, panoramic roof, power tailgate and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG QS gets fabric upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth. Climate control is 3-zone in the MG QS and 2-zone in the Mazda CX-60.
Drivetrain
The MG QS uses a 2.0L Turbo Petrol producing 153kW and 360Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout.
The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.
The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 138kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG QS measures 4,983mm long on a 2,915mm wheelbase, 243mm longer than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 203L in the MG QS and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 367L advantage. The MG QS seats 7 vs 5.
For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 200kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.8m diameter
Good
Based on 10.8m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,394/year for the MG QS and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $256 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-60.
Estimated annual total: $2,394 (MG QS) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Mazda CX-60 saves you roughly $256 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). The MG QS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG QS if: You prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda CX-60 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
This is genuinely close. The MG QS and Mazda CX-60 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Mazda CX-60 will save you roughly $256 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-60 has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG QS and Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is the cheapest at $44,240 before on-road costs. That undercuts the MG QS by $2,750.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Mazda CX-60 uses the least fuel at 7.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MG QS and Mazda CX-60 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Mazda CX-60 has the largest boot at 570L.
Which can tow the most?
The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.
Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet
Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
