CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Qashqai vs KGM Torres
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Qashqai vs KGM Torres

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanKGM
Price (RRP)$34,665$34,990
Power110kW120kW
0-100 km/h8.8s11.8s
Fuel Economy6.5 L/100km7.9 L/100km
Boot Space430L455L
Towing1,500kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Price Breakdown

The Nissan Qashqai starts from $34,665 before on-road costs, while the KGM Torres opens at $34,990. That makes the Nissan Qashqai the more affordable entry point by $325.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,132 and $38,489 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Nissan Qashqai by roughly $1,995 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Qashqai features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the KGM Torres gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan Qashqai stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that you will not find on the KGM Torres. The KGM Torres counters with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan Qashqai gets cloth upholstery while the KGM Torres offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Nissan Qashqai and 1-zone in the KGM Torres.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Qashqai uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.8 seconds.

The KGM Torres responds with a Turbo GDi making 120kW and 280Nm, paired to a 6-speed automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.8 seconds.

The KGM Torres has the clear power advantage at 120kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan Qashqai is 3.0s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Qashqai measures 4,425mm long on a 2,665mm wheelbase, 275mm shorter than the KGM Torres at 4,700mm (2,700mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Torres generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 430L in the Nissan Qashqai and 455L in the KGM Torres, giving the KGM Torres a 25L advantage.

For towing, the KGM Torres leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 11.2m

Nissan Qashqai ST ICE
10.6mTighter
Best
KGM Torres ELX
11.2m
Worst
Nissan Qashqai
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Torres
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,853/year for the Nissan Qashqai and $2,252/year for the KGM Torres. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Nissan Qashqai.

Estimated annual total: $1,853 (Nissan Qashqai) vs $2,252 (KGM Torres). The Nissan Qashqai saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Qashqai) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Torres). The KGM Torres has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Qashqai if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Torres if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Nissan Qashqai and KGM Torres trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Nissan Qashqai will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The KGM Torres adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Qashqai and KGM Torres?

The Nissan Qashqai is the cheapest at $34,665 before on-road costs. That undercuts the KGM Torres by $325.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Qashqai uses the least fuel at 6.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan Qashqai all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Torres has the largest boot at 455L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Qashqai has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Torres has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Torres makes the most power at 120kW. The Nissan Qashqai is quickest to 100km/h in 8.8s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs