Peugeot 508 vs Mazda BT-50
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Peugeot 508
Price TBC
Fastback
Petrol
1.6L PureTech turbo petrol
165kW
5.5 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
487L
Mazda BT-50
From $36,400
Ute
Diesel
Diesel
120kW
6.9 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
—
Track the Peugeot 508 & Mazda BT-50
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Peugeot 508 features a 10-inch touchscreen, while the Mazda BT-50 gets a 7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Peugeot 508 stands out with head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Mazda BT-50. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Peugeot 508 uses a 1.6L PureTech turbo petrol producing 165kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.1 seconds.
The Mazda BT-50 responds with a Diesel making 120kW and 400Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.
The Peugeot 508 has the clear power advantage at 165kW vs 120kW. In the real-world sprint, the Peugeot 508 is 2.8s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Peugeot 508 measures 4,750mm long on a 2,800mm wheelbase, 570mm shorter than the Mazda BT-50 at 5,320mm (3,125mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda BT-50 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Mazda BT-50 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,600kg. That 1,900kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.5m diameter
Large
Based on 12.5m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Large
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 10.9 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: 3-point turn
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.9 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: careful, tight swing
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Peugeot 508 and $1,967/year for the Mazda BT-50. That is a $399 annual difference in favour of the Peugeot 508.
Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Peugeot 508) vs $1,967 (Mazda BT-50). The Peugeot 508 saves you roughly $399 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Peugeot 508) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda BT-50). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Peugeot 508 if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Peugeot's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Mazda BT-50 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Peugeot 508 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Peugeot 508 will save you roughly $399 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Peugeot 508 and Mazda BT-50?
The Mazda BT-50 is the cheapest at $36,400 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Peugeot 508 uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Mazda BT-50 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which can tow the most?
The Mazda BT-50 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The Peugeot 508 makes the most power at 165kW. The Peugeot 508 is quickest to 100km/h in 8.1s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
