CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsRAM 1500 vs Ford Ranger Super Duty
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

RAM 1500 vs Ford Ranger Super Duty

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecRAMFord
Price (RRP)$119,950$82,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power291kW154kW
0-100 km/h7.5s
Fuel Economy13.1 L/100km
Boot Space900L
Towing4,500kg4,500kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the RAM 1500 & Ford Ranger Super Duty

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The RAM 1500 starts from $119,950 before on-road costs, while the Ford Ranger Super Duty opens at $82,990. That makes the Ford Ranger Super Duty the more affordable entry point by $36,960.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $131,945 and $91,289 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The RAM 1500 stands out with heated front seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Ford Ranger Super Duty. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The RAM 1500 uses a Petrol V8 producing 291kW and 556Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.5 seconds.

The Ford Ranger Super Duty responds with a 3.0L V6 turbo-diesel making 154kW and 600Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving the rear wheels.

The RAM 1500 has the clear power advantage at 291kW vs 154kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The RAM 1500 measures 5,916mm long on a 3,672mm wheelbase, 446mm longer than the Ford Ranger Super Duty at 5,470mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the RAM 1500 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford Ranger Super Duty leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 4,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.4m diameter

Large

RAM 1500 Big Horn V8
14.4m
RAM 1500 Big Horn V8
14.4m · Large

Based on 14.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator — U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.4 m Ø

Large

9.0 m road
RAM 1500 Turning circle · Ø 14.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)

Needs about 12.6 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.

!

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m — 3-point turn

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m — 3-point turn

Standard parking bay

2.1 m wide — fits with room

!

Tight carpark aisle

6 m — careful, tight swing

Narrow laneway

3.5 m — no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (RAM 1500) vs 5 years (Ford Ranger Super Duty). The Ford Ranger Super Duty has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the RAM 1500 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer RAM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Ranger Super Duty if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger Super Duty takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford Ranger Super Duty adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, RAM 1500 and Ford Ranger Super Duty?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty is the cheapest at $82,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the RAM 1500 by $36,960.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The RAM 1500 uses the least fuel at 13.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of RAM 1500 and Ford Ranger Super Duty carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The RAM 1500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The RAM 1500 makes the most power at 291kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia