RAM 2500 vs Ford F-150
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
RAM 2500
From $172,950
Ute
Diesel
Diesel Turbo
276kW
15.6 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
900L
Ford F-150
From $114,950
Ute
Petrol
Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost)
298kW
13.4 L/100km
ANCAP: no data
—
Track the RAM 2500 & Ford F-150
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The RAM 2500 starts from $172,950 before on-road costs, while the Ford F-150 opens at $114,950. That makes the Ford F-150 the more affordable entry point by $58,000.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $190,245 and $126,445 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ford F-150 by roughly $3,135 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The RAM 2500 features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Ford F-150 gets a 12-inch display and 12-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The RAM 2500 stands out with heated front seats that you will not find on the Ford F-150. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the RAM 2500 gets leather upholstery while the Ford F-150 offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The RAM 2500 uses a Diesel Turbo producing 276kW and 1152Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.
The Ford F-150 responds with a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) making 298kW and 678Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving all four wheels.
The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 276kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The RAM 2500 measures 6,066mm long on a 3,785mm wheelbase, 142mm shorter than the Ford F-150 at 6,208mm (3,997mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the RAM 2500 leads with a 8,000kg braked capacity vs 4,500kg. That 3,500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
14.4m to 15.6m
Based on 14.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 15.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $4,446/year for the RAM 2500 and $3,819/year for the Ford F-150. That is a $627 annual difference in favour of the Ford F-150.
Estimated annual total: $4,446 (RAM 2500) vs $3,819 (Ford F-150). The Ford F-150 saves you roughly $627 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (RAM 2500) vs 5 years (Ford F-150). The Ford F-150 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the RAM 2500 if: You need stronger towing, or prefer RAM's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Ford F-150 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Ford F-150 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Ford F-150 will save you roughly $627 a year in fuel. The Ford F-150 adds peace of mind with a longer 5-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, RAM 2500 and Ford F-150?
The Ford F-150 is the cheapest at $114,950 before on-road costs. That undercuts the RAM 2500 by $58,000.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Ford F-150 uses the least fuel at 13.4L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of RAM 2500 and Ford F-150 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.
Which can tow the most?
The RAM 2500 has the highest braked towing capacity at 8,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Ford F-150 has the longest warranty at 5 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
