CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Enyaq vs Toyota Kluger
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Enyaq vs Toyota Kluger

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)$59,990$62,410
Range (WLTP)575km
Battery82 kWh
Power210kW184kW
0-100 km/h5.4s7.9s
Max DC Charge175kW
10-80% Charge Time21 min
Fuel Economy5.6 L/100km
Boot Space585L241L
Towing2,000kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Enyaq starts from $59,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota Kluger opens at $62,410. That makes the Skoda Enyaq the more affordable entry point by $2,420.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $65,989 and $68,651 respectively.

The Skoda Enyaq qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Toyota Kluger, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Enyaq and Toyota Kluger hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 94% for the Skoda Enyaq and 96% for the Toyota Kluger.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. Both models are evenly matched with 5 out of 10 key ADAS systems.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. The Skoda Enyaq adds a 360-degree camera that the Toyota Kluger misses.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Enyaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 5.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Kluger gets a 8-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Enyaq stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, heated front seats, ventilated seats and power tailgate that you will not find on the Toyota Kluger. The Toyota Kluger counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Enyaq gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota Kluger offers cloth.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Enyaq uses a Electric Motor producing 210kW and 545Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 5.4 seconds.

The Toyota Kluger responds with a 2.5L 4-cyl Hybrid making 184kW and 242Nm, paired to a cvt driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.9 seconds.

The Skoda Enyaq has the clear power advantage at 210kW vs 184kW. In the real-world sprint, the Skoda Enyaq is 2.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Enyaq measures 4,659mm long on a 2,766mm wheelbase, 307mm shorter than the Toyota Kluger at 4,966mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Kluger generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 585L in the Skoda Enyaq and 241L in the Toyota Kluger, giving the Skoda Enyaq a 344L advantage. The Toyota Kluger seats 7 vs 5.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.4m

Skoda Enyaq 85 Sportline
9.3mTighter
Best
Toyota Kluger GX Hybrid AWD
11.4m
Worst
Skoda Enyaq
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Kluger
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Enyaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Kluger). The Skoda Enyaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Enyaq if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Kluger if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Skoda Enyaq takes 6 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Skoda Enyaq has a clear edge. The Skoda Enyaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Enyaq and Toyota Kluger?

The Skoda Enyaq is the cheapest at $59,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota Kluger by $2,420.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota Kluger uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Enyaq and Toyota Kluger all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Enyaq has the largest boot at 585L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Kluger has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Enyaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Enyaq makes the most power at 210kW. The Skoda Enyaq is quickest to 100km/h in 5.4s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs