CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsSkoda Kodiaq vs Toyota bZ4X
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota bZ4X

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecSkodaToyota
Price (RRP)$54,990$55,990
Range (WLTP)516km
Battery71.4 kWh
Power110kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.1s7.5s
Max DC Charge150kW
10-80% Charge Time30 min
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km
Boot Space270L500L
Towing2,000kg1,500kg
Warranty7yr / 999.999k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Skoda Kodiaq starts from $54,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota bZ4X opens at $55,990. That makes the Skoda Kodiaq the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $60,489 and $61,589 respectively.

The Toyota bZ4X qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Kodiaq, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

Both the Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota bZ4X hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 89% for the Skoda Kodiaq and 88% for the Toyota bZ4X.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Skoda Kodiaq packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Toyota bZ4X.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Skoda Kodiaq and 7 in the Toyota bZ4X.

Feature Showdown

The Skoda Kodiaq features a 13-inch touchscreen paired with a 10-inch digital dash, while the Toyota bZ4X gets a 14-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Skoda Kodiaq stands out with heated front seats that you will not find on the Toyota bZ4X. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Skoda Kodiaq gets leather upholstery while the Toyota bZ4X offers synthetic leather. Climate control is 3-zone in the Skoda Kodiaq and 2-zone in the Toyota bZ4X.

Drivetrain

The Skoda Kodiaq uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.

The Toyota bZ4X responds with a Electric making 150kW and 266Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.5 seconds.

The Toyota bZ4X has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 110kW. In the real-world sprint, the Toyota bZ4X is 1.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Skoda Kodiaq measures 4,758mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 68mm longer than the Toyota bZ4X at 4,690mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota bZ4X generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq and 500L in the Toyota bZ4X, giving the Toyota bZ4X a 230L advantage. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m to 11.4m

Toyota bZ4X FWD
11.2mTighter
Best
Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4m
Worst
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota bZ4X
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota bZ4X). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You want the lower entry price, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota bZ4X if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota bZ4X trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. If boot space matters, the Toyota bZ4X has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota bZ4X?

The Skoda Kodiaq is the cheapest at $54,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota bZ4X by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq and Toyota bZ4X all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota bZ4X has the largest boot at 500L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota bZ4X makes the most power at 150kW. The Toyota bZ4X is quickest to 100km/h in 7.5s.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs