CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Suzuki Ignis vs Skoda Yeti
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Suzuki Ignis vs Skoda Yeti

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 23 Sep 2026, price 30 Sep 2026

Specifications in progress

Skoda Yeti: we're still completing kerb weight, ground clearance and turning circle.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecSuzukiSkoda
Price (RRP)$22,490$23,490
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power66kW77kW
0-100 km/h12.8s11.4s
Fuel Economy4.9 L/100km6 L/100km
Boot (seats up)271L321L
Towing—1,200kg
Warranty3yr / 100k km3yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Suzuki Ignis & Skoda Yeti

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Suzuki Ignis starts from $22,490 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Yeti opens at $23,490. That makes the Suzuki Ignis the more affordable entry point by $1,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $24,739 and $25,839 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Ignis by roughly $1,565 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Suzuki Ignis

  • REC-006262 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
  • REC-006259 · published 5 Feb 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, the steering shaft nut may not be tightened to specifications.Year range on the notice: 2022 - 2023
  • REC-001655 · published 24 May 2021The fuel tank breather pipe may have been incorrectly moulded to the top of the fuel tank.Year range on the notice: 2020
  • 3 more on the model page.

Skoda Yeti

  • REC-001196 · published 15 Oct 2019Due to a production fault, over time a crack in the transmissions pressure accumulator can occur.Year range on the notice: 2008 - 2015
  • REC-003799 · published 17 Jul 2017The gas generator of some front seat belt tensioners may have been incorrectly crimped onto the actuator pipe of the belt tensioner.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • REC-003689 · published 5 Apr 2016Due to a manufacturing fault the side airbags may deploy abnormally during an accident.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
  • 1 more on the model page.

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems.

The Suzuki Ignis stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Yeti. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Suzuki Ignis gets cloth upholstery while the Skoda Yeti offers fabric.

Drivetrain

The Suzuki Ignis uses a Petrol producing 66kW and 120Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 12.8 seconds.

The Skoda Yeti responds with a 4 cylinder inline turbocharged engine with high pressure direct injection making 77kW and 175Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.4 seconds.

The Skoda Yeti has the clear power advantage at 77kW vs 66kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Skoda Yeti is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Suzuki Ignis measures 3,700mm long on a 2,435mm wheelbase, 523mm shorter than the Skoda Yeti at 4,223mm (2,578mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Skoda Yeti generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 271L in the Suzuki Ignis and 321L in the Skoda Yeti, giving the Skoda Yeti a 50L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1101L vs 1485L.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m diameter

Excellent

Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4m
←
Suzuki Ignis GL Auto
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4 m Ø

Excellent

9.0 m road
Suzuki Ignis Turning circle · Ø 9.4 m Kerb strike
Scrub the turn

Clears the U-turn in one swing

Needs about 8.3 m of road; you have 9.0 m.

✓

U-turn on a wide street

≥ 10 m: clears in one

!

U-turn on a standard street

7 m: 3-point turn

✓

Standard parking bay

1.7 m wide: fits with room

✓

Tight carpark aisle

6 m: swings in

✕

Narrow laneway

3.5 m: no room to turn

Turning circle ratings

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).

Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,397/year for the Suzuki Ignis and $1,710/year for the Skoda Yeti. That is a $313 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Ignis.

Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Ignis) vs 3 years / 999,999km (Skoda Yeti). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Suzuki Ignis if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Yeti if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

Suzuki Ignis: Top CarSorted Score, 57 vs 50

The Suzuki Ignis comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (57 vs 50), taking 2 of 5 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (Suzuki Ignis ahead by 14), fuel economy (Suzuki Ignis ahead by 10), performance (Skoda Yeti ahead by 9). The Suzuki Ignis will save you roughly $313 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Skoda Yeti has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

One enquiry, local dealers' best price on each. Free for you to use. If you buy, the dealer may pay us a commission.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Suzuki Ignis and Skoda Yeti?

The Suzuki Ignis is the cheapest at $22,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Yeti by $1,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Suzuki Ignis uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Suzuki Ignis and Skoda Yeti carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The Skoda Yeti has the largest boot at 321L with the seats up (1,485L with the seats folded).

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Yeti has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Skoda Yeti makes the most power at 77kW. The Skoda Yeti is quickest to 100km/h in 11.4s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs