BYD Atto 2 DM-i vs Skoda Yeti
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 23 Sep 2026
BYD Atto 2 DM-i: not on sale yet, so BYD hasn't published warranty and CO2 emissions.
Skoda Yeti: we're still completing kerb weight, ground clearance and turning circle.
Blank cells below mean we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Track the BYD Atto 2 DM-i & Skoda Yeti
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i starts from $24,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Yeti opens at $23,490. That makes the Skoda Yeti the more affordable entry point by $1,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $27,489 and $25,839 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the BYD Atto 2 DM-i by roughly $7,325 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
BYD Atto 2 DM-i
None open on our record
Skoda Yeti
- REC-001196 · published 15 Oct 2019Due to a production fault, over time a crack in the transmissions pressure accumulator can occur.Year range on the notice: 2008 - 2015
- REC-003799 · published 17 Jul 2017The gas generator of some front seat belt tensioners may have been incorrectly crimped onto the actuator pipe of the belt tensioner.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- REC-003689 · published 5 Apr 2016Due to a manufacturing fault the side airbags may deploy abnormally during an accident.Year range on the notice: the notice prints no build range
- 1 more on the model page.
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Charging Times
How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.
How long to charge
7.9kWh usableEstimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L — features our data doesn't list for the Skoda Yeti. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses a 1.5L 4-cylinder petrol producing 122kW and 300Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.1 seconds.
The Skoda Yeti responds with a 4 cylinder inline turbocharged engine with high pressure direct injection making 77kW and 175Nm, paired to a 6-speed manual driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.4 seconds.
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i has the clear power advantage at 122kW vs 77kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the BYD Atto 2 DM-i is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i measures 4,330mm long on a 2,620mm wheelbase, 107mm longer than the Skoda Yeti at 4,223mm (2,578mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the BYD Atto 2 DM-i generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 425L in the BYD Atto 2 DM-i and 321L in the Skoda Yeti, giving the BYD Atto 2 DM-i a 104L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1335L vs 1485L.
For towing, the Skoda Yeti leads with a 1,200kg braked capacity vs 750kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.6m diameter
Good
Based on 10.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.3 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $245/year for the BYD Atto 2 DM-i and $1,710/year for the Skoda Yeti. That is a $1,465 annual difference in favour of the BYD Atto 2 DM-i.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the BYD Atto 2 DM-i if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer BYD's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Skoda Yeti if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
BYD Atto 2 DM-i: Top CarSorted Score, 61 vs 50, but the Skoda Yeti is $1,500 cheaper
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (61 vs 50), taking 4 of 6 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: technology (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 39), fuel economy (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 18), performance (BYD Atto 2 DM-i ahead by 17). The BYD Atto 2 DM-i will save you roughly $1,465 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the BYD Atto 2 DM-i has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, BYD Atto 2 DM-i and Skoda Yeti?
The Skoda Yeti is the cheapest at $23,490 before on-road costs. That undercuts the BYD Atto 2 DM-i by $1,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i uses the least fuel at 5.1L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
None of BYD Atto 2 DM-i and Skoda Yeti carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.
Which has the most boot space?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i has the largest boot at 425L with the seats up (1,335L with the seats folded).
Which can tow the most?
The Skoda Yeti has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,200kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The BYD Atto 2 DM-i makes the most power at 122kW. The BYD Atto 2 DM-i is quickest to 100km/h in 9.1s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
