CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolkswagen T-Cross vs Nissan Qashqai
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen T-Cross vs Nissan Qashqai

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolkswagenNissan
Price (RRP)$34,990$34,665
Fuel typePetrolPetrol
Power85kW110kW
0-100 km/h10.2s8.8s
Fuel Economy5.6 L/100km6.1 L/100km
Boot Space385L430L
Towing1,100kg1,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Volkswagen T-Cross & Nissan Qashqai

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Volkswagen T-Cross starts from $34,990 before on-road costs, while the Nissan Qashqai opens at $34,665. That makes the Nissan Qashqai the more affordable entry point by $325.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $38,489 and $38,132 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Volkswagen T-Cross features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Nissan Qashqai gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volkswagen T-Cross stands out with Apple CarPlay and wireless charging that you will not find on the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen T-Cross uses a Petrol producing 85kW and 200Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.2 seconds.

The Nissan Qashqai responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.8 seconds.

The Nissan Qashqai has the clear power advantage at 110kW vs 85kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan Qashqai is 1.4s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen T-Cross measures 4,108mm long on a 2,563mm wheelbase, 317mm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai at 4,425mm (2,665mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Qashqai generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 385L in the Volkswagen T-Cross and 430L in the Nissan Qashqai, giving the Nissan Qashqai a 45L advantage.

For towing, the Nissan Qashqai leads with a 1,500kg braked capacity vs 1,100kg. That 400kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.6m to 10.6m

Volkswagen T-Cross 85TSI Life
10.6mTighter
Best
Nissan Qashqai ST ICE
10.6m
Best
Volkswagen T-Cross 85TSI Life
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Nissan Qashqai ST ICE
10.6m · Good

Based on 10.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,596/year for the Volkswagen T-Cross and $1,739/year for the Nissan Qashqai. That is a $143 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen T-Cross.

Estimated annual total: $1,596 (Volkswagen T-Cross) vs $1,739 (Nissan Qashqai). The Volkswagen T-Cross saves you roughly $143 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen T-Cross) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Qashqai). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen T-Cross if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Nissan Qashqai if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Nissan Qashqai takes 5 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Volkswagen T-Cross will save you roughly $143 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Nissan Qashqai has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen T-Cross and Nissan Qashqai?

The Nissan Qashqai is the cheapest at $34,665 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen T-Cross by $325.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen T-Cross uses the least fuel at 5.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Nissan Qashqai all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan Qashqai has the largest boot at 430L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Qashqai has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Nissan Qashqai makes the most power at 110kW. The Nissan Qashqai is quickest to 100km/h in 8.8s.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs