Nissan Qashqai vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the Nissan Qashqai & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Nissan Qashqai starts from $47,165 before on-road costs, while the Toyota C-HR opens at $46,940. That makes the Toyota C-HR the more affordable entry point by $225.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $51,882 and $51,634 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Toyota C-HR by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The Toyota C-HR holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Nissan Qashqai. Adult occupant protection scored 78% for the Nissan Qashqai and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Nissan Qashqai, against 6 on the Toyota C-HR.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Nissan Qashqai and 10 in the Toyota C-HR.
Feature Showdown
The Nissan Qashqai features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with head-up display, panoramic roof and heated front seats that you will not find on the Toyota C-HR. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Nissan Qashqai gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Toyota C-HR offers cloth.
Drivetrain
The Nissan Qashqai uses a Petrol producing 140kW and 330Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.9 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Nissan Qashqai has the clear power advantage at 140kW vs 103kW. In the real-world sprint, the Nissan Qashqai is 2.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Nissan Qashqai measures 4,425mm long on a 2,665mm wheelbase, 63mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Nissan Qashqai generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 404L in the Nissan Qashqai and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Nissan Qashqai a 16L advantage.
For towing, the Nissan Qashqai leads with a 750kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 25kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.1m
Based on 11.1m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,368/year for the Nissan Qashqai and $1,140/year for the Toyota C-HR. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Toyota C-HR.
Estimated annual total: $1,368 (Nissan Qashqai) vs $1,140 (Toyota C-HR). The Toyota C-HR saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Qashqai) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Nissan Qashqai if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Nissan Qashqai takes 4 of 7 key spec categories. The Toyota C-HR will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Nissan Qashqai and Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Nissan Qashqai by $225.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The Toyota C-HR has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The Nissan Qashqai has the largest boot at 404L.
Which is the most powerful?
The Nissan Qashqai makes the most power at 140kW. The Nissan Qashqai is quickest to 100km/h in 7.9s.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
