CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsVolkswagen Tayron vs MG QS
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Volkswagen Tayron vs MG QS

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecVolkswagenMG
Price (RRP)$48,290$46,990
Power110kW153kW
0-100 km/h7.8s
Fuel Economy7.6 L/100km8.4 L/100km
Boot Space570L203L
Towing2,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km10yr / 250k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Volkswagen Tayron starts from $48,290 before on-road costs, while the MG QS opens at $46,990. That makes the MG QS the more affordable entry point by $1,300.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $53,119 and $51,689 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Volkswagen Tayron by roughly $1,140 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Volkswagen Tayron and MG QS hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 87% for the Volkswagen Tayron and 88% for the MG QS.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The MG QS packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 6 in the Volkswagen Tayron.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 9 in the Volkswagen Tayron and 7 in the MG QS.

Feature Showdown

The Volkswagen Tayron features a 12.9-inch touchscreen, while the MG QS gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volkswagen Tayron stands out with wireless charging that you will not find on the MG QS. The MG QS counters with panoramic roof and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Volkswagen Tayron uses a Petrol producing 110kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.8 seconds.

The MG QS responds with a 2.0L Turbo Petrol making 153kW and 360Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.

The MG QS has the clear power advantage at 153kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Volkswagen Tayron measures 4,792mm long on a 2,791mm wheelbase, 191mm shorter than the MG QS at 4,983mm (2,915mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 570L in the Volkswagen Tayron and 203L in the MG QS, giving the Volkswagen Tayron a 367L advantage.

For towing, the Volkswagen Tayron leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 2,000kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.2m diameter

Average

Volkswagen Tayron 110TSI Life
11.2m
Volkswagen Tayron
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,166/year for the Volkswagen Tayron and $2,394/year for the MG QS. That is a $228 annual difference in favour of the Volkswagen Tayron.

Estimated annual total: $2,166 (Volkswagen Tayron) vs $2,394 (MG QS). The Volkswagen Tayron saves you roughly $228 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volkswagen Tayron) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS). The MG QS has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Volkswagen Tayron if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Volkswagen's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the MG QS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Volkswagen Tayron and MG QS trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Volkswagen Tayron will save you roughly $228 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Volkswagen Tayron has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Volkswagen Tayron and MG QS?

The MG QS is the cheapest at $46,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Volkswagen Tayron by $1,300.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Volkswagen Tayron uses the least fuel at 7.6L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Volkswagen Tayron and MG QS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Volkswagen Tayron has the largest boot at 570L.

Which can tow the most?

The Volkswagen Tayron has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG QS makes the most power at 153kW.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs