CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsAbarth 500e vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 500e vs KGM Musso EV

Two electric cars go head to head. Which EV is the better buy for Australian drivers in 2026?

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecAbarthKGM
Price (RRP)$60,500$60,000
Range (WLTP)253km420km
Battery42 kWh80.6 kWh
Power113kW152kW
0-100 km/h7s10.9s
Max DC Charge85kW300kW
10-80% Charge Time35 min36 min
Boot Space185L532L
Towing1,800kg
Warranty3yr / 150k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety4 Stars5 Stars
V2LNoYes

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 500e starts from $60,500 before on-road costs, while the KGM Musso EV opens at $60,000. That makes the KGM Musso EV the more affordable entry point by $500.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $66,550 and $66,000 respectively.

Both models qualify for Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) exemption, which is a significant advantage for salary-sacrificed novated leases. Depending on your tax bracket, this can save $5,000-$15,000+ per year compared to an equivalent ICE vehicle.

Safety Rundown

The KGM Musso EV holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 4 stars for the Abarth 500e.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The KGM Musso EV packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 1 in the Abarth 500e.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Abarth 500e and 8 in the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV adds a 360-degree camera that the Abarth 500e misses.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 500e features a 10.3-inch touchscreen, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Abarth 500e stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging and JBL audio that you will not find on the KGM Musso EV. The KGM Musso EV counters with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats, ventilated seats, V2L and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 500e gets leather & alcantara upholstery while the KGM Musso EV offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 500e and 2-zone in the KGM Musso EV.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 500e uses a Electric producing 113kW and 235Nm of torque, sent through a single-speed automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 152kW and 339Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 152kW vs 113kW. In the real-world sprint, the Abarth 500e is 3.9s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Battery: 42kWh (Abarth 500e) vs 80.6kWh (KGM Musso EV), giving WLTP ranges of 253km and 420km. DC fast charging peaks at 85kW (Abarth 500e) vs 300kW (KGM Musso EV).

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 500e measures 3,673mm long on a 2,322mm wheelbase, 1487mm shorter than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 500e and 532L in the KGM Musso EV, giving the KGM Musso EV a 347L advantage. The KGM Musso EV seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.4m to 12.2m

Abarth 500e Scorpionissima
9.4mTighter
Best
KGM Musso EV 2WD
12.2m
Worst
Abarth 500e
9.4m · Excellent

Based on 9.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso EV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 500e) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). The KGM Musso EV has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 500e if: You or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The KGM Musso EV takes 10 of 12 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the KGM Musso EV has a clear edge. The KGM Musso EV adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 500e and KGM Musso EV?

The KGM Musso EV is the cheapest at $60,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 500e by $500.

Which has the longest driving range?

The KGM Musso EV has the most range at 420km (WLTP).

Which charges fastest?

The KGM Musso EV accepts the highest DC charging at up to 300kW.

Which is safest?

The KGM Musso EV has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.

Which has the most boot space?

The KGM Musso EV has the largest boot at 532L.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso EV has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,800kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The KGM Musso EV has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 152kW. The Abarth 500e is quickest to 100km/h in 7s.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · All Utes