CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›Abarth 695 vs GAC Aion UT
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Abarth 695 vs GAC Aion UT

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Hatchbacks compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 20 Sep 2026, price 20 Aug 2026

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
Abarth 695Competizione4?08
GAC Aion UTPremium11?01

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecAbarthGAC
Price (RRP)$37,900$31,990
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

$37,900RRP

  • no option data for this car

$31,990RRP

  • no option data for this car

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)—430km
Battery—60 kWh
Power132kW150kW
0-100 km/h6.7s7.3s
Max DC Charge—87kW
Fuel Economy6 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)185L321L
Warranty3yr / 150k km8yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LNoYes

Track the Abarth 695 & GAC Aion UT

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Abarth 695 starts from $37,900 before on-road costs, while the GAC Aion UT opens at $31,990. That makes the GAC Aion UT the more affordable entry point by $5,910.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $41,690 and $35,189 respectively.

The GAC Aion UT currently qualifies for the electric-vehicle FBT exemption, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Abarth 695 does not: only battery-electric vehicles qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

Abarth 695

None open on our record

GAC Aion UT

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

60kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

58 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 87kW · 0–80%

41 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (6.6kW AC, 87kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Abarth 695 features a 7-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the GAC Aion UT gets a 14.6-inch display and 8.8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC Aion UT counters with heated front seats and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Abarth 695 gets fabric upholstery while the GAC Aion UT offers pvc. Climate control is 1-zone in the Abarth 695 and 2-zone in the GAC Aion UT.

Drivetrain

The Abarth 695 uses a Turbo T-Jet producing 132kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 6.7 seconds.

The GAC Aion UT responds with a Electric making 150kW and 210Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.3 seconds.

The GAC Aion UT has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 132kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Abarth 695 is 0.6s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Abarth 695 measures 3,657mm long on a 2,300mm wheelbase, 613mm shorter than the GAC Aion UT at 4,270mm (2,750mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GAC Aion UT generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 185L in the Abarth 695 and 321L in the GAC Aion UT, giving the GAC Aion UT a 136L advantage. The GAC Aion UT seats 5 vs 4.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

9.3m to 11.2m

TightestAbarth 695 CompetizioneTightest turn at 9.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3mTighter
Best
GAC Aion UT Premium
11.2m
Worst
Abarth 695 Competizione
9.3m · Excellent

Based on 9.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GAC Aion UT Premium
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestAbarth 695Tightest turn at 9.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Abarth 695Tightest9.3 m
Excellent△ 3-point
GAC Aion UT11.2 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 3 years / 150,000km (Abarth 695) vs 8 years / 999,999km (GAC Aion UT). The GAC Aion UT has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Abarth 695 if: You or prefer Abarth's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GAC Aion UT if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

GAC Aion UT: Top CarSorted Score, 75 vs 63

The GAC Aion UT comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (75 vs 63), taking 5 of 6 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: reliability (GAC Aion UT ahead by 18), value (GAC Aion UT ahead by 13), practicality (GAC Aion UT ahead by 10). If boot space matters, the GAC Aion UT has a clear edge. The GAC Aion UT adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Abarth 695 and GAC Aion UT?

The GAC Aion UT is the cheapest at $31,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Abarth 695 by $5,910.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Abarth 695 uses the least fuel at 6L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

GAC Aion UT holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Abarth 695, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC Aion UT has the largest boot at 321L with the seats up.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC Aion UT has the longest warranty at 8 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC Aion UT makes the most power at 150kW. The Abarth 695 is quickest to 100km/h in 6.7s.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Hatchbacks · Best family cars · Best electric cars