CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsChery C5 vs GWM ORA 5
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Chery C5 vs GWM ORA 5

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecCheryGWM
Price (RRP)$27,500$30,900
Fuel typePetrolElectric
Range (WLTP)435km
Battery58.3 kWh
Power108kW150kW
0-100 km/h8.5s8s
Max DC Charge120kW
10-80% Charge Time20 min
Fuel Economy6.9 L/100km
Boot Space370L362L
Towing750kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data
V2LNoYes (6kW)

Track the Chery C5 & GWM ORA 5

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Chery C5 starts from $27,500 before on-road costs, while the GWM ORA 5 opens at $30,900. That makes the Chery C5 the more affordable entry point by $3,400.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. Estimated driveaway prices sit around $29,990 for the Chery C5 and $33,990 for the GWM ORA 5.

The GWM ORA 5 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Chery C5, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

58.3kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

56 min

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 120kW · 0–80%

29 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 120kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The Chery C5 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the GWM ORA 5 gets a 14.6-inch display and 10.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery C5 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the GWM ORA 5. The GWM ORA 5 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Chery C5 uses a Petrol producing 108kW and 210Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 8.5 seconds.

The GWM ORA 5 responds with a Electric making 150kW and 260Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8 seconds.

The GWM ORA 5 has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 108kW. In the real-world sprint, the GWM ORA 5 is 0.5s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery C5 measures 4,351mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 120mm shorter than the GWM ORA 5 at 4,471mm (2,720mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the GWM ORA 5 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 370L in the Chery C5 and 362L in the GWM ORA 5, giving the Chery C5 a 8L advantage.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.9m to 11.2m

TightestGWM ORA 5 LuxTightest turn at 10.9m, easiest U-turns and carparks
GWM ORA 5 Lux
10.9mTighter
Best
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m
Worst
Chery C5 Urban
11.2m · Average

Based on 11.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
GWM ORA 5 Lux
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestGWM ORA 5Tightest turn at 10.9m, needs the least road to swing around
Chery C511.2 m
Average△ 3-point
GWM ORA 5Tightest10.9 m
Good△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Chery C5) vs 7 years / 999,999km (GWM ORA 5). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Chery C5 if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the GWM ORA 5 if: You prioritise performance, or prefer GWM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GWM ORA 5 takes 4 of 6 key spec categories. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Chery C5 and GWM ORA 5?

The Chery C5 is the cheapest at $27,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GWM ORA 5 by $3,400.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Chery C5 uses the least fuel at 6.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Chery C5 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Chery C5 has the largest boot at 370L.

Which is the most powerful?

The GWM ORA 5 makes the most power at 150kW. The GWM ORA 5 is quickest to 100km/h in 8s.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best electric SUVs