Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid vs Honda Accord

Price and cost per week

Safety Rundown

ANCAP's published record does not give the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid a rating. We hold no ANCAP data for the Honda Accord. With no pair of ratings to compare, the active-safety features in the spec table above are the fairer comparison.

Recalls on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Feature Showdown

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Honda Accord gets a 12.3-inch display and 10.2-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid stands out with Apple CarPlay — features our data doesn't list for the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, power tailgate, Bose audio and ambient lighting. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid gets cloth upholstery while the Honda Accord offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 150kW and 310Nm of torque, sent through a auto to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.5 seconds.

The Honda Accord responds with a Hybrid making 135kW and 335Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.8 seconds.

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 135kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Honda Accord is 2.7s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid measures 4,330mm long on a 2,604mm wheelbase, 645mm shorter than the Honda Accord at 4,975mm (2,830mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Honda Accord generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid and 570L in the Honda Accord, giving the Honda Accord a 100L advantage.

Neither U-turns in one sweep on a 7 m local street (both need a three-point turn); the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid's turning circle is 0.8 m tighter, 10.6 m against 11.4 m kerb to kerb. The street estimate is indicative, worked from the published turning circles.

Cost to own

At 15,000 km a year, fuel for the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid costs about $1,539 a year (5.4 L/100km) and fuel for the Honda Accord about $1,226 a year (4.3 L/100km), at $1.90 a litre and 32c a kWh. That is $313 a year less for the Honda Accord.

Warranty: 7 years / unlimited km (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid) and 5 years / unlimited km (Honda Accord). Capped-price servicing: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid), 5 years (Honda Accord).

Where each one leads

The Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid: the lower starting price ($28,450 against $59,900), more power (150kW against 135kW) and the longer warranty (7 years against 5).

The Honda Accord: the bigger boot with the seats up (570L against 470L) and lower fuel or energy costs on our assumptions ($1,226 a year against $1,539).

The Verdict

Honda Accord scores higher, 75 vs 74

The Honda Accord scores 75 to the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid's 74 on the CarSorted Score, and leads 3 of the 6 spec rows that separate them. The biggest gaps: performance (Honda Accord ahead by 16 points), value (Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid ahead by 12 points), fuel economy (Honda Accord ahead by 10 points). At 15,000 km a year, fuel for the Honda Accord costs about $313 less (4.3 L/100km against 5.4 L/100km, at $1.90 a litre). Boot space with the seats up: 470L in the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, 570L in the Honda Accord. Warranty: 7 years on the Chery Tiggo 4 Hybrid, 5 on the Honda Accord.

Common questions