Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid vs MG QS
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.
Price Breakdown
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid starts from $49,550 before on-road costs, while the MG QS opens at $46,990. That makes the MG QS the more affordable entry point by $2,560.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,505 and $51,689 respectively.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The MG QS, as a petrol model, does not qualify.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by roughly $11,660 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Feature Showdown
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid features a 15.6-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the MG QS gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid stands out with wireless charging, heated front seats and Sony audio that you will not find on the MG QS. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid gets synthetic leather upholstery while the MG QS offers fabric. Climate control is 2-zone in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and 3-zone in the MG QS.
Drivetrain
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses a 1.5L Turbocharged Petrol producing 225kW and 215Nm of torque, sent through a dedicated hybrid transmission (3dht) to a FWD layout.
The MG QS responds with a 2.0L Turbo Petrol making 153kW and 360Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels.
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid has the clear power advantage at 225kW vs 153kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid measures 4,800mm long on a 2,750mm wheelbase, 183mm shorter than the MG QS at 4,983mm (2,915mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG QS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 143L in the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and 203L in the MG QS, giving the MG QS a 60L advantage.
For towing, the MG QS leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $62/year for the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and $2,394/year for the MG QS. That is a $2,332 annual difference in favour of the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid.
Estimated annual total: $62 (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs $2,394 (MG QS). The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid saves you roughly $2,332 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 7 years (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid) vs 10 years / 250,000km (MG QS). The MG QS has longer coverage. Capped-price servicing: 7yr (Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid)—.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid if: You prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the MG QS if: You want the lower entry price, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG QS takes 4 of 6 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid will save you roughly $2,332 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG QS has a clear edge. The MG QS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid and MG QS?
The MG QS is the cheapest at $46,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid by $2,560.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid uses the least fuel at 1.3L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — MG QS all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG QS has the largest boot at 203L.
Which can tow the most?
The MG QS has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG QS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 9 Super Hybrid makes the most power at 225kW.
Get ahead of your next car
Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
