CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsFord F-150 vs Kia Tasman
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ford F-150 vs Kia Tasman

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecFordKia
Price (RRP)$106,950$38,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power298kW154kW
0-100 km/h12.5s
Fuel Economy12.5 L/100km7.4 L/100km
Boot Space352L
Towing4,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars

Track the Ford F-150 & Kia Tasman

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ford F-150 starts from $106,950 before on-road costs, while the Kia Tasman opens at $38,990. That makes the Kia Tasman the more affordable entry point by $67,960.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $117,645 and $42,889 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Kia Tasman by roughly $7,270 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ford F-150 features a 12-inch touchscreen paired with a 12-inch digital dash, while the Kia Tasman gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ford F-150 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Kia Tasman. The Kia Tasman counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ford F-150 uses a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) producing 298kW and 678Nm of torque, sent through a 10-speed automatic to a 4WD layout.

The Kia Tasman responds with a Diesel making 154kW and 440Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12.5 seconds.

The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 154kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ford F-150 measures 5,908mm long on a 3,697mm wheelbase, 498mm longer than the Kia Tasman at 5,410mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.3m to 14.6m

TightestKia Tasman S 4x2Tightest turn at 12.3m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Kia Tasman S 4x2
12.3mTighter
Best
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab SWB
14.6m
Worst
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab SWB
14.6m · Large

Based on 14.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Kia Tasman S 4x2
12.3m · Large

Based on 12.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKia TasmanTightest turn at 12.3m, needs the least road to swing around
Ford F-15014.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Kia TasmanTightest12.3 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,563/year for the Ford F-150 and $2,109/year for the Kia Tasman. That is a $1,454 annual difference in favour of the Kia Tasman.

Estimated annual total: $3,563 (Ford F-150) vs $2,109 (Kia Tasman). The Kia Tasman saves you roughly $1,454 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ford F-150) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Tasman). The Kia Tasman has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ford F-150 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Kia Tasman if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Kia Tasman takes 3 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Kia Tasman will save you roughly $1,454 a year in fuel. The Kia Tasman adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ford F-150 and Kia Tasman?

The Kia Tasman is the cheapest at $38,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford F-150 by $67,960.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Kia Tasman uses the least fuel at 7.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Kia Tasman all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford F-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Kia Tasman has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.

Track the cars you're comparing

Sign up free for price-drop alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown covering launches, deals and reviews. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia