CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsGAC M8 vs Ford Tourneo
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

GAC M8 vs Ford Tourneo

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular People Movers compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecGACFord
Price (RRP)$76,590$71,500
Fuel typePlug-in HybridDiesel
Range (WLTP)106km
Electric range106km
Power274kW125kW
0-100 km/h9.5s
Fuel Economy6.1 kWh/100km (as hybrid)7.4 L/100km
Boot Space800L672L
Warranty8yr / 150k km5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Plug-in hybrid fuel economy is shown as a hybrid (battery depleted) so it compares fairly with the other car. A PHEV's official "combined" figure assumes you start every trip fully charged, so real-world economy depends on how often you plug in. Electric range shows how far it goes before the petrol engine is needed.

Track the GAC M8 & Ford Tourneo

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The GAC M8 starts from $76,590 before on-road costs, while the Ford Tourneo opens at $71,500. That makes the Ford Tourneo the more affordable entry point by $5,090.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $84,249 and $78,650 respectively.

The GAC M8 qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Ford Tourneo, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the GAC M8 by roughly $9,080 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge — from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC — estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

Feature Showdown

Both come with modern infotainment systems. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The GAC M8 stands out with Apple CarPlay, wireless charging, heated front seats, power tailgate, GAC Premium audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Ford Tourneo. The Ford Tourneo counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The GAC M8 uses a Petrol Turbo producing 274kW and 630Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.5 seconds.

The Ford Tourneo lines up making 125kW and 390Nm, paired to its gearbox driving the front wheels.

The GAC M8 has the clear power advantage at 274kW vs 125kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The GAC M8 measures 5,212mm long on a 3,070mm wheelbase, 162mm longer than the Ford Tourneo at 5,050mm (3,100mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Tourneo generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 800L in the GAC M8 and 672L in the Ford Tourneo, giving the GAC M8 a 128L advantage. The Ford Tourneo seats 8 vs 7.

0

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.9m to 12.8m

Ford Tourneo Active
10.9mTighter
Best
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m
Worst
GAC M8 PHEV Premium
12.8m · Large

Based on 12.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Tourneo Active
10.9m · Good

Based on 10.9m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $293/year for the GAC M8 and $2,109/year for the Ford Tourneo. That is a $1,816 annual difference in favour of the GAC M8.

Estimated annual total: $293 (GAC M8) vs $2,109 (Ford Tourneo). The GAC M8 saves you roughly $1,816 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 8 years / 150,000km (GAC M8) vs 5 years (Ford Tourneo). The GAC M8 has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the GAC M8 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, value a longer warranty, or prefer GAC's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Tourneo if: You want the lower entry price, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The GAC M8 takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. The GAC M8 will save you roughly $1,816 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the GAC M8 has a clear edge. The GAC M8 adds peace of mind with a longer 8-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, GAC M8 and Ford Tourneo?

The Ford Tourneo is the cheapest at $71,500 before on-road costs. That undercuts the GAC M8 by $5,090.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The GAC M8 uses the least fuel at 6.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of GAC M8 and Ford Tourneo carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which has the most boot space?

The GAC M8 has the largest boot at 800L.

Which has the best warranty?

The GAC M8 has the longest warranty at 8 years / 150k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The GAC M8 makes the most power at 274kW.

Free: Chinese Cars in Australia Cheat Sheet

Sign up free and we'll email you our Chinese Cars Cheat Sheet (PDF) — all 22 brands ranked on service, parts, warranty and dealer experience. Plus new-car launches, reviews and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All People Movers