CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIneos Quartermaster vs Ford F-150
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ineos Quartermaster vs Ford F-150

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecIneosFord
Price (RRP)$105,000$114,950
Fuel typeDieselPetrol
Power183kW298kW
0-100 km/h9.8s
Fuel Economy12.1 L/100km13.4 L/100km
Boot Space390L
Towing3,500kg4,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Ineos Quartermaster & Ford F-150

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ineos Quartermaster starts from $105,000 before on-road costs, while the Ford F-150 opens at $114,950. That makes the Ineos Quartermaster the more affordable entry point by $9,950.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $115,500 and $126,445 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Ineos Quartermaster by roughly $1,850 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ineos Quartermaster features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Ford F-150 gets a 12-inch display and 12-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ineos Quartermaster stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats and JBL audio that you will not find on the Ford F-150. The Ford F-150 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ineos Quartermaster uses a Twin-turbo diesel producing 183kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.8 seconds.

The Ford F-150 responds with a Petrol V6 Twin-Turbo (EcoBoost) making 298kW and 678Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford F-150 has the clear power advantage at 298kW vs 183kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ineos Quartermaster measures 5,395mm long on a 3,227mm wheelbase, 813mm shorter than the Ford F-150 at 6,208mm (3,997mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford F-150 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford F-150 leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

14.5m to 15.6m

TightestIneos Quartermaster DieselTightest turn at 14.5m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ineos Quartermaster Diesel
14.5mTighter
Best
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m
Worst
Ineos Quartermaster Diesel
14.5m · Large

Based on 14.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford F-150 XLT 4x4 Double Cab LWB
15.6m · Large

Based on 15.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestIneos QuartermasterTightest turn at 14.5m, needs the least road to swing around
Ineos QuartermasterTightest14.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Ford F-15015.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $3,449/year for the Ineos Quartermaster and $3,819/year for the Ford F-150. That is a $370 annual difference in favour of the Ineos Quartermaster.

Estimated annual total: $3,449 (Ineos Quartermaster) vs $3,819 (Ford F-150). The Ineos Quartermaster saves you roughly $370 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years (Ineos Quartermaster) vs 5 years (Ford F-150). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Ineos Quartermaster)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ineos Quartermaster if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Ineos's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford F-150 if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Ineos Quartermaster and Ford F-150 trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Ineos Quartermaster will save you roughly $370 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ineos Quartermaster and Ford F-150?

The Ineos Quartermaster is the cheapest at $105,000 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ford F-150 by $9,950.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ineos Quartermaster uses the least fuel at 12.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Ineos Quartermaster and Ford F-150 carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford F-150 has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford F-150 makes the most power at 298kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia