CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsJeep Wrangler vs Mazda CX-70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Jeep Wrangler vs Mazda CX-70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecJeepMazda
Price (RRP)$81,990$76,720
Power200kW254kW
0-100 km/h9.3s
Fuel Economy10.2 L/100km8.1 L/100km
Boot Space365L598L
Towing1,497kg2,500kg
Warranty5yr / 100k km5yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Price Breakdown

The Jeep Wrangler starts from $81,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-70 opens at $76,720. That makes the Mazda CX-70 the more affordable entry point by $5,270.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $90,189 and $84,392 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Mazda CX-70 by roughly $2,990 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

Both the Jeep Wrangler and Mazda CX-70 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Mazda CX-70 packs more ADAS features with 7 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Jeep Wrangler.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Jeep Wrangler and 7 in the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 adds a 360-degree camera that the Jeep Wrangler misses.

Feature Showdown

The Jeep Wrangler features a 8.4-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-70 gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments.

The Jeep Wrangler stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, heated front seats, Alpine audio and ambient lighting that you will not find on the Mazda CX-70. The Mazda CX-70 counters with head-up display and Bose audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Jeep Wrangler uses a Petrol I4 Turbo producing 200kW and 400Nm of torque, sent through a 8-speed automatic to a 4x4 layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.3 seconds.

The Mazda CX-70 responds with a Petrol making 254kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Mazda CX-70 has the clear power advantage at 254kW vs 200kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Jeep Wrangler measures 4,334mm long on a 2,459mm wheelbase, 786mm shorter than the Mazda CX-70 at 5,120mm (3,120mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda CX-70 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 365L in the Jeep Wrangler and 598L in the Mazda CX-70, giving the Mazda CX-70 a 233L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 2050L vs 2015L. The Mazda CX-70 seats 5 vs 4.

For towing, the Mazda CX-70 leads with a 2,500kg braked capacity vs 1,497kg. That 1,003kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

10.0m to 11.8m

Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 2-Door
10.0mTighter
Best
Mazda CX-70 G50e GT
11.8m
Worst
Jeep Wrangler
10.0m · Good

Based on 10.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Mazda CX-70
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,907/year for the Jeep Wrangler and $2,309/year for the Mazda CX-70. That is a $598 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-70.

Estimated annual total: $2,907 (Jeep Wrangler) vs $2,309 (Mazda CX-70). The Mazda CX-70 saves you roughly $598 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 100,000km (Jeep Wrangler) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-70). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Jeep Wrangler)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Jeep Wrangler if: You or prefer Jeep's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Mazda CX-70 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, need stronger towing, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda CX-70 takes 5 of 5 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Mazda CX-70 will save you roughly $598 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Mazda CX-70 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Jeep Wrangler and Mazda CX-70?

The Mazda CX-70 is the cheapest at $76,720 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Jeep Wrangler by $5,270.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Mazda CX-70 uses the least fuel at 8.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Jeep Wrangler and Mazda CX-70 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda CX-70 has the largest boot at 598L.

Which can tow the most?

The Mazda CX-70 has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda CX-70 makes the most power at 254kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs