Kia Niro vs Toyota C-HR
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Kia Niro: we're still completing price, turning circle, fuel consumption, CO2 emissions and fuel tank.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Kia Niro & Toyota C-HR
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.
Safety Rundown
Both the Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 88% for the Kia Niro and 85% for the Toyota C-HR.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Toyota C-HR, against 1 on the Kia Niro.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking.
Feature Showdown
The Kia Niro features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 10.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota C-HR gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
Drivetrain
The Kia Niro uses a Petrol I4 + HEV producing 104kW and 265Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed dual clutch to a FWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.4 seconds.
The Toyota C-HR responds with a Petrol making 103kW and 142Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.2 seconds.
The Kia Niro has the clear power advantage at 104kW vs 103kW. In the 0-100 sprint (manufacturer-claimed), the Toyota C-HR is 0.2s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Kia Niro measures 4,420mm long on a 2,720mm wheelbase, 58mm longer than the Toyota C-HR at 4,362mm (2,640mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Kia Niro generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 451L in the Kia Niro and 388L in the Toyota C-HR, giving the Kia Niro a 63L advantage.
For towing, the Kia Niro leads with a 1,300kg braked capacity vs 725kg. That 575kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m diameter
Good
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Good
Needs a 3-point turn (one reverse)
Needs about 9.0 m to swing round without stopping. Road is 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.8 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.
Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (Kia Niro) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota C-HR). The Kia Niro has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Kia Niro if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Kia's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota C-HR if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Kia Niro takes 4 of 5 key spec categories. If boot space matters, the Kia Niro has a clear edge. The Kia Niro adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR?
The Toyota C-HR is the cheapest at $46,940 before on-road costs.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Toyota C-HR uses the least fuel at 4L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched on crash rating: Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Kia Niro has the largest boot at 451L.
Which can tow the most?
The Kia Niro has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,300kg.
Which has the best warranty?
The Kia Niro has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Kia Niro makes the most power at 104kW. The Toyota C-HR is quickest to 100km/h in 10.2s.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
