Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo XC90

The Mazda CX-60 starts from $44,240 before on-road costs, while the Volvo XC90 opens at $97,990. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $53,750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $48,664 and $107,789 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Both the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo XC90 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 91% for the Mazda CX-60 and 97% for the Volvo XC90.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volvo XC90 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 7 in the Mazda CX-60 and 8 in the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.

The Mazda CX-60 features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Volvo XC90 gets a 11.2-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda CX-60 stands out with Apple CarPlay that you will not find on the Volvo XC90. The Volvo XC90 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Bowers & Wilkins audio. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda CX-60 gets cloth upholstery while the Volvo XC90 offers leather. Climate control is 2-zone in the Mazda CX-60 and 4-zone in the Volvo XC90.

The Mazda CX-60 uses a Petrol producing 138kW and 250Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.4 seconds.

The Volvo XC90 responds with a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 making 183kW and 350Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.7 seconds.

The Volvo XC90 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The Mazda CX-60 measures 4,740mm long on a 2,870mm wheelbase, 213mm shorter than the Volvo XC90 at 4,953mm (2,984mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 570L in the Mazda CX-60 and 301L in the Volvo XC90, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 269L advantage. The Volvo XC90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Volvo XC90 leads with a 2,400kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60 and $2,309/year for the Volvo XC90. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-60.

Estimated annual total: $2,138 (Mazda CX-60) vs $2,309 (Volvo XC90). The Mazda CX-60 saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90). Both match on warranty length.