CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMG U9 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

MG U9 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMGToyota
Price (RRP)$52,990$75,600
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power160kW150kW
0-100 km/h12s
Fuel Economy7.9 L/100km10.6 L/100km
Towing3,500kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the MG U9 & Toyota LandCruiser 70

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The MG U9 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the MG U9 the more affordable entry point by $22,610.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $83,160 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs favour the MG U9 by roughly $3,845 in fuel alone.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The MG U9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.

The MG U9 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the MG U9 gets artificial leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the MG U9 and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.

Drivetrain

The MG U9 uses a 2.5L Turbo Diesel producing 160kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a zf 8 speed automatic to a 4x4 layout.

The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.

The MG U9 has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The MG U9 measures 5,500mm long on a 3,300mm wheelbase, 635mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.6m to 13.3m

TightestToyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate AutoTightest turn at 12.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6mTighter
Best
MG U9 Explore
13.3m
Worst
MG U9 Explore
13.3m · Large

Based on 13.3m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota LandCruiser 70 Wagon WorkMate Auto
12.6m · Large

Based on 12.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestToyota LandCruiser 70Tightest turn at 12.6m, needs the least road to swing around
MG U913.3 m
Large△ 3-point
Toyota LandCruiser 70Tightest12.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the MG U9 and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the MG U9.

Warranty: 5 years (MG U9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the MG U9 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The MG U9 takes 3 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The MG U9 will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, MG U9 and Toyota LandCruiser 70?

The MG U9 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $22,610.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The MG U9 uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

MG U9 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota LandCruiser 70, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which can tow the most?

The MG U9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The MG U9 makes the most power at 160kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · All Wagons · Best utes in Australia · Best family cars