MG U9 vs Toyota LandCruiser 70
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Data checked: specs 18 Oct 2026, price 6 Sep 2026
Driver assistance, as the manufacturer lists it
Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.
StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.
From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.
$52,990RRP
- with the Toyota LandCruiser 70's standard kit: $52,990 (nothing to add)
$75,600RRP
- no option data for this car
Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.
Track the MG U9 & Toyota LandCruiser 70
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG U9 starts from $52,990 before on-road costs, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 opens at $75,600. That makes the MG U9 the more affordable entry point by $22,610.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $58,289 and $83,160 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the MG U9 by roughly $3,845 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.
Recalls on our record
MG U9
None open on our record
Toyota LandCruiser 70
- REC-005079 · published 5 Jul 2016The front fender bracket may fail causing the front fender to become loose.Year range on the notice: 2015 - 2017
A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.
Feature Showdown
The MG U9 features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 gets a 6.7-inch display and 4.2-inch instruments.
The MG U9 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG U9 gets artificial leather upholstery while the Toyota LandCruiser 70 offers cloth. Climate control is 2-zone in the MG U9 and 1-zone in the Toyota LandCruiser 70.
Drivetrain
The MG U9 uses a 2.5L Turbo Diesel producing 160kW and 520Nm of torque, sent through a zf 8 speed automatic to a 4x4 layout.
The Toyota LandCruiser 70 responds with a Diesel making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 12 seconds.
The MG U9 has the clear power advantage at 160kW vs 150kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG U9 measures 5,500mm long on a 3,300mm wheelbase, 635mm longer than the Toyota LandCruiser 70 at 4,865mm (2,730mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG U9 generally means more rear legroom.
For towing, the Toyota LandCruiser 70 leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 0kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
12.6m to 13.3m
Based on 13.3m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 12.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,252/year for the MG U9 and $3,021/year for the Toyota LandCruiser 70. That is a $769 annual difference in favour of the MG U9.
Warranty: 5 years (MG U9) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota LandCruiser 70). Both match on warranty length.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG U9 if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, want lower running costs, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Toyota LandCruiser 70 if: You or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
MG U9: Top CarSorted Score, 72 vs 58
The MG U9 comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (72 vs 58), taking 3 of 3 key spec rows below and coming in at a lower price. The deciding gaps: safety (MG U9 ahead by 27), fuel economy (MG U9 ahead by 25), value (MG U9 ahead by 18). The MG U9 will save you roughly $769 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG U9 and Toyota LandCruiser 70?
The MG U9 is the cheapest at $52,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Toyota LandCruiser 70 by $22,610.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The MG U9 uses the least fuel at 7.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
What are the ANCAP safety ratings?
MG U9 holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota LandCruiser 70, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.
Which can tow the most?
The MG U9 has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG U9 makes the most power at 160kW.
Stay across the market
Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.
- Weekly new-car rundown
- Price cuts and new deals
- New launches and reviews
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
