MG ZS vs Suzuki Fronx
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Track the MG ZS & Suzuki Fronx
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The MG ZS starts from $22,990 before on-road costs, while the Suzuki Fronx opens at $28,490. That makes the MG ZS the more affordable entry point by $5,500.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $25,289 and $31,339 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Fronx by roughly $2,565 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
The MG ZS holds a 5-star ANCAP rating vs 1 stars for the Suzuki Fronx. Adult occupant protection scored 81% for the MG ZS and 48% for the Suzuki Fronx.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 6 of 10 key ADAS systems on the MG ZS, against 5 on the Suzuki Fronx.
Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the MG ZS and 6 in the Suzuki Fronx.
Feature Showdown
The MG ZS features a 10.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Suzuki Fronx gets a 9-inch display. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.
The MG ZS stands out with power tailgate that you will not find on the Suzuki Fronx. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Interior trim differs: the MG ZS gets cloth upholstery while the Suzuki Fronx offers synthetic leather.
Drivetrain
The MG ZS uses a Petrol producing 81kW and 140Nm of torque, sent through a cvt to a FWD layout.
The Suzuki Fronx responds with a Petrol making 75.8kW and 137Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 11.5 seconds.
The MG ZS has the clear power advantage at 81kW vs 75.8kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The MG ZS measures 4,430mm long on a 2,610mm wheelbase, 435mm longer than the Suzuki Fronx at 3,995mm (2,520mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the MG ZS generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 443L in the MG ZS and 304L in the Suzuki Fronx, giving the MG ZS a 139L advantage.
0Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
10.4m to 11.0m
Based on 11.0m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Based on 10.4m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Compare U-turns side by side
Turning Circle · U-turn compare
kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep
Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.
Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,910/year for the MG ZS and $1,397/year for the Suzuki Fronx. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Fronx.
Estimated annual total: $1,910 (MG ZS) vs $1,397 (Suzuki Fronx). The Suzuki Fronx saves you roughly $513 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 10 years / 250,000km (MG ZS) vs 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Fronx). The MG ZS has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the MG ZS if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer MG's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Suzuki Fronx if: You want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The MG ZS takes 6 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The Suzuki Fronx will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the MG ZS has a clear edge. The MG ZS adds peace of mind with a longer 10-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, MG ZS and Suzuki Fronx?
The MG ZS is the cheapest at $22,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Suzuki Fronx by $5,500.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Fronx uses the least fuel at 4.9L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
The MG ZS has the highest ANCAP rating at 5 stars.
Which has the most boot space?
The MG ZS has the largest boot at 443L.
Which has the best warranty?
The MG ZS has the longest warranty at 10 years / 250k km.
Which is the most powerful?
The MG ZS makes the most power at 81kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
