CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Juke vs Ford Everest
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Juke vs Ford Everest

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanFord
Price (RRP)TBC$68,990
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power84kW184kW
Fuel Economy5.8 L/100km8.5 L/100km
Boot Space422L259L
Towing1,250kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Nissan Juke & Ford Everest

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan Juke and Ford Everest hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 94% for the Nissan Juke and 86% for the Ford Everest.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on both.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Nissan Juke and 9 in the Ford Everest.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Juke features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Ford Everest gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan Juke stands out with Apple CarPlay and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Ford Everest. The Ford Everest counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, wireless charging, ventilated seats and power tailgate. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan Juke gets part cloth / part leather accented upholstery while the Ford Everest offers leather. Climate control is 1-zone in the Nissan Juke and 2-zone in the Ford Everest.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Juke uses a HR10DDT producing 84kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic to a FWD layout.

The Ford Everest responds with a Diesel V6 Turbo making 184kW and 600Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ford Everest has the clear power advantage at 184kW vs 84kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Juke measures 4,210mm long on a 2,636mm wheelbase, 768mm shorter than the Ford Everest at 4,978mm (2,900mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Everest generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 422L in the Nissan Juke and 259L in the Ford Everest, giving the Nissan Juke a 163L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1305L vs 1818L. The Ford Everest seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Ford Everest leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,250kg. That 2,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.8m

TightestNissan Juke ST-LTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0mTighter
Best
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m
Worst
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Everest Sport
11.8m · Average

Based on 11.8m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan JukeTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan JukeTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Ford Everest11.8 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Nissan Juke and $2,423/year for the Ford Everest. That is a $770 annual difference in favour of the Nissan Juke.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Juke) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Ford Everest). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Juke if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Everest if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Nissan Juke and Ford Everest trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Nissan Juke will save you roughly $770 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Nissan Juke has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Juke and Ford Everest?

The Ford Everest is the cheapest at $68,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Juke uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Nissan Juke and Ford Everest all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan Juke has the largest boot at 422L.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Everest has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ford Everest makes the most power at 184kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs