CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Juke vs Toyota Prado
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Juke vs Toyota Prado

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$72,500
Fuel typePetrolDiesel
Power84kW150kW
0-100 km/h9.6s
Fuel Economy5.8 L/100km7.6 L/100km
Boot Space422L408L
Towing1,250kg3,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 Stars5 Stars

Track the Nissan Juke & Toyota Prado

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

Both the Nissan Juke and Toyota Prado hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 94% for the Nissan Juke and 85% for the Toyota Prado.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. We can confirm 7 of 10 key ADAS systems on the Nissan Juke, against 5 on the Toyota Prado.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 6 in the Nissan Juke and 9 in the Toyota Prado.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Juke features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota Prado gets a 12.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan Juke stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota Prado. The Toyota Prado counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan Juke gets part cloth / part leather accented upholstery while the Toyota Prado offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Nissan Juke and 2-zone in the Toyota Prado.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Juke uses a HR10DDT producing 84kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota Prado responds with a 2.8L 4-cyl Turbo-Diesel 48V V-Active making 150kW and 500Nm, paired to a automatic driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.6 seconds.

The Toyota Prado has the clear power advantage at 150kW vs 84kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Juke measures 4,210mm long on a 2,636mm wheelbase, 780mm shorter than the Toyota Prado at 4,990mm (2,850mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota Prado generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 422L in the Nissan Juke and 408L in the Toyota Prado, giving the Nissan Juke a 14L advantage.

For towing, the Toyota Prado leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,250kg. That 2,250kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 12.0m

TightestNissan Juke ST-LTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m
Worst
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota Prado GX Diesel
12.0m · Average

Based on 12.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan JukeTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan JukeTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota Prado12.0 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Nissan Juke and $2,166/year for the Toyota Prado. That is a $513 annual difference in favour of the Nissan Juke.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Juke) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota Prado). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Juke if: You need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota Prado if: You prioritise performance, need stronger towing, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

This is genuinely close. The Nissan Juke and Toyota Prado trade blows across the spec sheet, and neither runs away with an outright win. The Nissan Juke will save you roughly $513 a year in fuel. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Juke and Toyota Prado?

The Toyota Prado is the cheapest at $72,500 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Nissan Juke uses the least fuel at 5.8L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched on crash rating: Nissan Juke and Toyota Prado all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Nissan Juke has the largest boot at 422L.

Which can tow the most?

The Toyota Prado has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota Prado makes the most power at 150kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs