CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsNissan Juke vs Toyota RAV4
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Nissan Juke vs Toyota RAV4

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular SUVs compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecNissanToyota
Price (RRP)TBC$45,990
Fuel typePetrolHybrid
Power84kW143kW
0-100 km/h8.4s
Fuel Economy5.8 L/100km4.5 L/100km
Boot Space422L705L
Towing1,250kg800kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP Safety5 StarsNo data

Track the Nissan Juke & Toyota RAV4

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Nissan Juke features a 8-inch touchscreen paired with a 7-inch digital dash, while the Toyota RAV4 gets a 10.5-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Nissan Juke stands out with Apple CarPlay, heated front seats and ambient lighting — features our data doesn't list for the Toyota RAV4. The Toyota RAV4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Nissan Juke gets part cloth / part leather accented upholstery while the Toyota RAV4 offers cloth. Climate control is 1-zone in the Nissan Juke and 2-zone in the Toyota RAV4.

Drivetrain

The Nissan Juke uses a HR10DDT producing 84kW and 180Nm of torque, sent through a 7-speed dual-clutch automatic to a FWD layout.

The Toyota RAV4 responds with a Petrol Hybrid making 143kW and 221Nm, paired to a cvt (e-cvt) driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 8.4 seconds.

The Toyota RAV4 has the clear power advantage at 143kW vs 84kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Nissan Juke measures 4,210mm long on a 2,636mm wheelbase, 390mm shorter than the Toyota RAV4 at 4,600mm (2,690mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Toyota RAV4 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 422L in the Nissan Juke and 705L in the Toyota RAV4, giving the Toyota RAV4 a 283L advantage.

For towing, the Nissan Juke leads with a 1,250kg braked capacity vs 800kg. That 450kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

TightestNissan Juke ST-LTightest turn at 11.0m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0mTighter
Best
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m
Worst
Nissan Juke ST-L
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Toyota RAV4 GX Hybrid 2WD
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestNissan JukeTightest turn at 11.0m, needs the least road to swing around
Nissan JukeTightest11.0 m
Good△ 3-point
Toyota RAV411.4 m
Average△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,653/year for the Nissan Juke and $1,283/year for the Toyota RAV4. That is a $370 annual difference in favour of the Toyota RAV4.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Nissan Juke) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Toyota RAV4). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Nissan Juke if: You need stronger towing, or prefer Nissan's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Toyota RAV4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, want lower running costs, or prefer Toyota's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Toyota RAV4 takes 3 of 4 key spec categories. The Toyota RAV4 will save you roughly $370 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Toyota RAV4 has a clear edge. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Nissan Juke and Toyota RAV4?

The Toyota RAV4 is the cheapest at $45,990 before on-road costs.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Toyota RAV4 uses the least fuel at 4.5L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

Nissan Juke holds a 5-star ANCAP rating. We have no published ANCAP rating for Toyota RAV4, so there is nothing to compare on crash performance. Compare the active-safety features above instead.

Which has the most boot space?

The Toyota RAV4 has the largest boot at 705L.

Which can tow the most?

The Nissan Juke has the highest braked towing capacity at 1,250kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Toyota RAV4 makes the most power at 143kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All SUVs · Best mid-size SUVs · Best hybrid cars