Suzuki Swift vs Chery Tiggo 4
A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.
Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.
Suzuki Swift
From $16,990
Hatchback
Petrol
Petrol
70kW
5.5 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
210L
Chery Tiggo 4
From $21,750
SUV
Petrol
Petrol
108kW
7.4 L/100km
5★ ANCAP
380L
Chery Tiggo 4: we're still completing 0-100km/h, turning circle and braked towing.
A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.
Track the Suzuki Swift & Chery Tiggo 4
Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.
Price Breakdown
The Suzuki Swift starts from $16,990 before on-road costs, while the Chery Tiggo 4 opens at $21,750. That makes the Suzuki Swift the more affordable entry point by $4,760.
Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $18,689 and $23,925 respectively.
Over 5 years, the running costs favour the Suzuki Swift by roughly $2,705 in fuel alone.
Safety Rundown
Both the Suzuki Swift and Chery Tiggo 4 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating.
Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Chery Tiggo 4 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 0 in the Suzuki Swift.
Both include the essentials: core safety systems. Airbag count is 7 in the Suzuki Swift and 7 in the Chery Tiggo 4.
Feature Showdown
Both come with modern infotainment systems.
The Chery Tiggo 4 counters with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto that the Suzuki Swift does not offer. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.
Drivetrain
The Suzuki Swift uses a Petrol producing 70kW and 130Nm of torque, sent through a 5-speed manual to a FWD layout.
The Chery Tiggo 4 responds with a Petrol making 108kW and 210Nm, paired to a cvt driving the front wheels.
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the clear power advantage at 108kW vs 70kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.
Space & Comfort
The Suzuki Swift measures 3,850mm long on a 2,430mm wheelbase, 457mm shorter than the Chery Tiggo 4 at 4,307mm (2,610mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Chery Tiggo 4 generally means more rear legroom.
Boot space is 210L in the Suzuki Swift and 380L in the Chery Tiggo 4, giving the Chery Tiggo 4 a 170L advantage.
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
9.6m diameter
Excellent
Based on 9.6m turning circle:
- U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
- Standard parking bay
- Tight carparks
- Narrow laneways
Turning circle ratings
Interactive simulator: U-turns, parking & towing
Turning Circle
Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns are easier in tight carparks and U-turns.
Excellent
Clears the U-turn in one swing
Needs about 8.4 m of road; you have 9.0 m.
U-turn on a wide street
≥ 10 m: clears in one
U-turn on a standard street
7 m: 3-point turn
Standard parking bay
1.7 m wide: fits with room
Tight carpark aisle
6 m: swings in
Narrow laneway
3.5 m: no room to turn
Turning circle ratings
Standard widths: AU local streets carry ~5.5–7 m of carriageway; main roads ~9–12 m. AS 2890.1 carpark aisles are ~5.8–6.6 m for 90° bays (2.6 m wide × 5.4 m deep).
Road, aisle, swing and off-tracking figures are indicative estimates from the published turning circle. Verify in person before relying on them.
True Cost to Own
Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $1,568/year for the Suzuki Swift and $2,109/year for the Chery Tiggo 4. That is a $541 annual difference in favour of the Suzuki Swift.
Estimated annual total: $1,568 (Suzuki Swift) vs $2,109 (Chery Tiggo 4). The Suzuki Swift saves you roughly $541 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.
Warranty: 3 years / 100,000km (Suzuki Swift) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Chery Tiggo 4). The Chery Tiggo 4 has longer coverage.
Who Should Buy Which?
Buy the Suzuki Swift if: You want the lower entry price, want lower running costs, or prefer Suzuki's approach to design and ownership experience.
Buy the Chery Tiggo 4 if: You prioritise performance, need more boot space, value a longer warranty, or prefer Chery's approach to design and ownership experience.
The Verdict
The Chery Tiggo 4 takes 3 of 5 key spec categories. The Suzuki Swift will save you roughly $541 a year in fuel. If boot space matters, the Chery Tiggo 4 has a clear edge. The Chery Tiggo 4 adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.
Common questions
Which is cheapest, Suzuki Swift and Chery Tiggo 4?
The Suzuki Swift is the cheapest at $16,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Chery Tiggo 4 by $4,760.
Which is the most fuel-efficient?
The Suzuki Swift uses the least fuel at 5.5L/100km on the combined cycle.
Which is safest?
They are evenly matched — Suzuki Swift and Chery Tiggo 4 all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.
Which has the most boot space?
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the largest boot at 380L.
Which has the best warranty?
The Chery Tiggo 4 has the longest warranty at 7 years / Unlimited.
Which is the most powerful?
The Chery Tiggo 4 makes the most power at 108kW.
Track the cars you're comparing
Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.
- Price-drop alerts on these models
- Spec-change alerts
- Weekly new-car rundown
No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!
