Volvo XC90 vs Mazda CX-60

The Volvo XC90 starts from $97,990 before on-road costs, while the Mazda CX-60 opens at $44,240. That makes the Mazda CX-60 the more affordable entry point by $53,750.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $107,789 and $48,664 respectively.

Over 5 years, the running costs are nearly identical since both have similar efficiency.

Both the Volvo XC90 and Mazda CX-60 hold a 5-star ANCAP safety rating. Adult occupant protection scored 97% for the Volvo XC90 and 91% for the Mazda CX-60.

Where the two diverge is in active safety technology. The Volvo XC90 packs more ADAS features with 6 out of 10 key systems fitted, compared to 5 in the Mazda CX-60.

Both include the essentials: autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, adaptive cruise control, a reversing camera. Airbag count is 8 in the Volvo XC90 and 7 in the Mazda CX-60. The Volvo XC90 adds a 360-degree camera that the Mazda CX-60 misses.

The Volvo XC90 features a 11.2-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the Mazda CX-60 gets a 10.3-inch display and 7-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Volvo XC90 stands out with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, head-up display, wireless charging, panoramic roof, heated front seats, power tailgate and Bowers & Wilkins audio that you will not find on the Mazda CX-60. The Mazda CX-60 counters with Apple CarPlay. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Volvo XC90 gets leather upholstery while the Mazda CX-60 offers cloth. Climate control is 4-zone in the Volvo XC90 and 2-zone in the Mazda CX-60.

The Volvo XC90 uses a 2.0L 4-cyl turbocharged 48V mild hybrid B5 producing 183kW and 350Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a AWD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 7.7 seconds.

The Mazda CX-60 responds with a Petrol making 138kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the rear wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 7.4 seconds.

The Volvo XC90 has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 138kW. In the real-world sprint, the Mazda CX-60 is 0.3s quicker. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

The Volvo XC90 measures 4,953mm long on a 2,984mm wheelbase, 213mm longer than the Mazda CX-60 at 4,740mm (2,870mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Volvo XC90 generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 301L in the Volvo XC90 and 570L in the Mazda CX-60, giving the Mazda CX-60 a 269L advantage. The Volvo XC90 seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Volvo XC90 leads with a 2,400kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 600kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Based on 15,000km of annual driving, fuel costs roughly $2,309/year for the Volvo XC90 and $2,138/year for the Mazda CX-60. That is a $171 annual difference in favour of the Mazda CX-60.

Estimated annual total: $2,309 (Volvo XC90) vs $2,138 (Mazda CX-60). The Mazda CX-60 saves you roughly $171 per year in total ownership costs. Use our Fuel Cost Calculator to estimate based on your driving.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Volvo XC90) vs 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda CX-60). Both match on warranty length.