CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsIneos Quartermaster vs Ford Ranger Super Duty
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Ineos Quartermaster vs Ford Ranger Super Duty

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Specifications in progress

Ford Ranger Super Duty: not on sale yet, so Ford hasn't published 0-100km/h, fuel consumption and CO2 emissions.

A blank cell below means we don't have that figure, not that the car scores badly on it. We leave them empty rather than estimate, so any row where one car is blank isn't a like-for-like comparison yet.

SpecIneosFord
Price (RRP)$105,000$82,990
Fuel typeDieselDiesel
Power183kW154kW
0-100 km/h9.8s
Fuel Economy12.1 L/100km
Boot Space390L
Towing3,500kg4,500kg
Warranty5yr / Unlimited5yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data

Track the Ineos Quartermaster & Ford Ranger Super Duty

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

The Ineos Quartermaster starts from $105,000 before on-road costs, while the Ford Ranger Super Duty opens at $82,990. That makes the Ford Ranger Super Duty the more affordable entry point by $22,010.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $115,500 and $91,289 respectively.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Ineos Quartermaster features a 12.3-inch touchscreen, while the Ford Ranger Super Duty gets a 12-inch display and 8-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Ineos Quartermaster stands out with heated front seats and JBL audio that you will not find on the Ford Ranger Super Duty. The Ford Ranger Super Duty counters with wireless charging. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The Ineos Quartermaster uses a Twin-turbo diesel producing 183kW and 550Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 9.8 seconds.

The Ford Ranger Super Duty responds with a 3.0L V6 turbo-diesel making 154kW and 600Nm, paired to a 10-speed automatic driving all four wheels.

The Ineos Quartermaster has the clear power advantage at 183kW vs 154kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Ineos Quartermaster measures 5,395mm long on a 3,227mm wheelbase, 75mm shorter than the Ford Ranger Super Duty at 5,470mm (3,270mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Ford Ranger Super Duty generally means more rear legroom.

For towing, the Ford Ranger Super Duty leads with a 4,500kg braked capacity vs 3,500kg. That 1,000kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

13.6m to 14.5m

TightestFord Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-ChassisTightest turn at 13.6m, easiest U-turns and carparks
Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6mTighter
Best
Ineos Quartermaster Diesel
14.5m
Worst
Ineos Quartermaster Diesel
14.5m · Large

Based on 14.5m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Ford Ranger Super Duty Single Cab Cab-Chassis
13.6m · Large

Based on 13.6m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestFord Ranger Super DutyTightest turn at 13.6m, needs the least road to swing around
Ineos Quartermaster14.5 m
Large△ 3-point
Ford Ranger Super DutyTightest13.6 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years (Ineos Quartermaster) vs 5 years (Ford Ranger Super Duty). Both match on warranty length. Capped-price servicing: 5yr (Ineos Quartermaster)—.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Ineos Quartermaster if: You prioritise performance, or prefer Ineos's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Ford Ranger Super Duty if: You want the lower entry price, need stronger towing, or prefer Ford's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Ford Ranger Super Duty takes 2 of 3 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Ineos Quartermaster and Ford Ranger Super Duty?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty is the cheapest at $82,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Ineos Quartermaster by $22,010.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Ineos Quartermaster uses the least fuel at 12.1L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of Ineos Quartermaster and Ford Ranger Super Duty carry a published ANCAP rating yet — check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The Ford Ranger Super Duty has the highest braked towing capacity at 4,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The Ineos Quartermaster makes the most power at 183kW.

Free alerts

Track the cars you're comparing

Get price-drop and spec-change alerts on the models in this comparison, plus our weekly new-car rundown of launches, deals and reviews.

  • Price-drop alerts on these models
  • Spec-change alerts
  • Weekly new-car rundown

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia