CS
CarSorted
Home›Comparisons›KGM Musso vs KGM Musso EV
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

KGM Musso vs KGM Musso EV

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular Utes compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

Data checked: specs 25 Jun 2026, price 23 Oct 2026

Winner
KGM Musso
KGM

KGM Musso

18 of 27 standard · no option data · 9 no data

Price TBC

The maker has not published an Australian price for this model yet.

Body
Ute
Fuel type
Diesel
Engine
Turbo DDi Diesel
Power
133kW
Economy
9 L/100km
Safety
No data
Boot (seats up)
532L
68CarSorted Score / 100

Top CarSorted Score, 68 vs 67

KGM Musso EV
KGM

KGM Musso EV

19 of 27 standard · no option data · 8 no data

Price TBC

The maker has not published an Australian price for this model yet.

Body
Ute
Fuel type
Electric
Engine
Electric
Power
266kW
Economy
No data
Safety
No data
Boot (seats up)
532L
67CarSorted Score / 100

Driver assistance, as the maker lists it

Swipe across. Tap a feature to see what it does and each car's source.

StandardOptional: printed price, +pack or NCO (no-cost)No, not offeredNo dataCounts beside each car use the same colours; ? is no option data.

Car
KGM MussoAdvance XLV9?03
KGM Musso EVAWD9?03

From each manufacturer's Australian equipment list. No data means that car's document does not say. The drawings are our own illustrations of how each kind of system works.

SpecKGMKGM
Price (RRP)TBCTBC
Equipped to matchEach car with the other's standard kit

No price

  • no option data for this car

No price

  • no price to build from against the KGM Musso

Printed option prices only. A pack is counted once and makes the figure a floor when it carries no printed price. Nothing is inferred from the other car.

Fuel typeDieselElectric
Range (WLTP)—380km
Battery—80.6 kWh
Power133kW266kW
0-100 km/h10.9s10.9s
Max DC Charge—300kW
10-80% Charge Time—46 min
Fuel Economy9 L/100km—
Boot (seats up)532L532L
Towing3,500kg1,800kg
Warranty7yr / Unlimited7yr / Unlimited
ANCAP SafetyNo dataNo data
V2LNoYes

Track the KGM Musso & KGM Musso EV

Get price-drop alerts on these models plus our free weekly new-car rundown. Unsubscribe anytime.

Price Breakdown

Pricing for one or both models is yet to be confirmed for the Australian market. We will update this comparison when official RRPs are announced.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Recalls on our record

KGM Musso

  • REC-006327 · published 8 Apr 2025Due to a manufacturing defect, under certain driving conditions the engine cooling fan fuse may fail.Year range on the notice: 2020 - 2024

KGM Musso EV

None open on our record

A recall covers the builds its notice lists, not every car of a model. Check your VIN at vehiclerecalls.gov.au.

Charging Times

How long each takes to charge, from a household power point to ultra-rapid DC, estimated from battery size and max charge rates.

How long to charge

80.6kWh usable

Public DC

50kW charger · 0–80%

1h 17m

Ultra-rapid DC

up to 300kW · 0–80%

16 min

Estimates from usable battery size and the car's max charge rates (7.4kW AC, 300kW DC). Real times vary with temperature, starting charge, charger output and the charging curve.

Feature Showdown

The KGM Musso features a 12.3-inch touchscreen paired with a 12.3-inch digital dash, while the KGM Musso EV gets a 12.3-inch display and 12.3-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The KGM Musso EV counters with V2L. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Drivetrain

The KGM Musso uses a Turbo DDi Diesel producing 133kW and 420Nm of torque, sent through a 6-speed automatic to a 4WD layout. It covers the 0-100km/h sprint in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV responds with a Electric making 266kW and 630Nm, paired to a 1-speed driving all four wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 10.9 seconds.

The KGM Musso EV has the clear power advantage at 266kW vs 133kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The KGM Musso measures 5,415mm long on a 3,110mm wheelbase, 255mm longer than the KGM Musso EV at 5,160mm (3,150mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the KGM Musso EV generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 532L in the KGM Musso and 532L in the KGM Musso EV.

For towing, the KGM Musso leads with a 3,500kg braked capacity vs 1,800kg. That 1,700kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

12.2m to 12.2m

TightestKGM Musso Advance XLVTightest turn at 12.2m, easiest U-turns and carparks
KGM Musso Advance XLV
12.2mTighter
Best
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2m
Best
KGM Musso Advance XLV
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
KGM Musso EV AWD
12.2m · Large

Based on 12.2m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large
Compare U-turns side by side

Turning Circle · U-turn compare

kerb-to-kerb, 2 cars
Tap to add/remove
TightestKGM MussoTightest turn at 12.2m, needs the least road to swing around
KGM MussoTightest12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
KGM Musso EV12.2 m
Large△ 3-point
Scrub the turn

0 of 2 clear a 7.0 m street in one sweep

Green cars complete the U-turn; amber need a 3-point turn. Drag the slider to test tighter streets.

Under 10 m · Excellent 10–11 m · Good 11–12 m · Average Over 12 m · Large

Standard widths: AU local streets ~5.5–7 m; main roads ~9–12 m.

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso) vs 7 years / 999,999km (KGM Musso EV). Both match on warranty length.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the KGM Musso if: You need stronger towing, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the KGM Musso EV if: You prioritise performance, or prefer KGM's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

KGM Musso: Top CarSorted Score, 68 vs 67

The KGM Musso comes out ahead on the CarSorted Score (68 vs 67), taking 1 of 3 key spec rows below. The deciding gaps: performance (KGM Musso EV ahead by 17), practicality (KGM Musso ahead by 15), fuel economy (KGM Musso ahead by 10). The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The KGM Musso uses the least fuel at 9L/100km on the combined cycle.

What are the ANCAP safety ratings?

None of KGM Musso and KGM Musso EV carry a published ANCAP rating yet, so there is no crash result to compare. Check back as they are tested.

Which can tow the most?

The KGM Musso has the highest braked towing capacity at 3,500kg.

Which is the most powerful?

The KGM Musso EV makes the most power at 266kW.

Free newsletter

Stay across the market

Get our weekly new-car rundown of launches, price moves, deals and reviews, straight from the data.

  • Weekly new-car rundown
  • Price cuts and new deals
  • New launches and reviews

No spam, unsubscribe anytime. By subscribing you agree to receive marketing emails.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Utes · Best utes in Australia