CS
CarSorted
HomeComparisonsMazda 6e vs Skoda Kodiaq
Spec Battle Updated 20 April 2026 5 min read

Mazda 6e vs Skoda Kodiaq

A detailed look at how two of Australia's most popular cars compare on price, running costs, safety, and everyday livability.

Specifications and pricing correct at time of publishing. Prices are RRP before on-road costs unless stated otherwise. Always confirm with the manufacturer or dealer before purchasing.

SpecMazdaSkoda
Price (RRP)$49,990$54,990
Range (WLTP)484km
Battery78 kWh
Power190kW110kW
0-100 km/h9.1s
Max DC Charge194kW
10-80% Charge Time15 min
Fuel Economy6.4 L/100km
Boot Space363L270L
Towing1,500kg2,000kg
Warranty5yr / 999.999k km7yr / 999.999k km
ANCAP SafetyNo data5 Stars
V2LYesNo

Price Breakdown

The Mazda 6e starts from $49,990 before on-road costs, while the Skoda Kodiaq opens at $54,990. That makes the Mazda 6e the more affordable entry point by $5,000.

Once you factor in stamp duty, registration, CTP insurance, and dealer delivery, expect to add roughly 8-12% on top of the RRP depending on your state. That puts estimated driveaway prices in the ballpark of $54,989 and $60,489 respectively.

The Mazda 6e qualifies for FBT exemption as an electric vehicle, which can dramatically reduce the effective cost for novated lease buyers. The Skoda Kodiaq, as a petrol model, does not qualify.

Safety Rundown

ANCAP safety ratings have not been published for both models yet. We will update this section when crash test results are available.

Feature Showdown

The Mazda 6e features a 26.5-inch touchscreen, while the Skoda Kodiaq gets a 13-inch display and 10-inch instruments. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard across both.

The Mazda 6e stands out with wireless charging, panoramic roof, ventilated seats and V2L that you will not find on the Skoda Kodiaq. The Skoda Kodiaq counters with heated front seats. Which feature set matters more depends on your daily routine and priorities.

Interior trim differs: the Mazda 6e gets synthetic leather upholstery while the Skoda Kodiaq offers leather.

Drivetrain

The Mazda 6e uses a Electric producing 190kW and 290Nm of torque, sent through a automatic to a RWD layout.

The Skoda Kodiaq responds with a Petrol making 110kW and 250Nm, paired to a automatic driving the front wheels. It gets to 100km/h in 9.1 seconds.

The Mazda 6e has the clear power advantage at 190kW vs 110kW. For most buyers, the way each car feels day-to-day matters more than outright acceleration.

Space & Comfort

The Mazda 6e measures 4,850mm long on a 2,902mm wheelbase, 92mm longer than the Skoda Kodiaq at 4,758mm (2,791mm wheelbase). The longer wheelbase on the Mazda 6e generally means more rear legroom.

Boot space is 363L in the Mazda 6e and 270L in the Skoda Kodiaq, giving the Mazda 6e a 93L advantage. Fold the rears and you get 1434L vs 2005L. The Skoda Kodiaq seats 7 vs 5.

For towing, the Skoda Kodiaq leads with a 2,000kg braked capacity vs 1,500kg. That 500kg difference matters if you regularly hitch up.

Turning Circle

Kerb-to-kerb diameter. Smaller turns easier in tight carparks and U-turns.

11.0m to 11.4m

Mazda 6e GT
11.0mTighter
Best
Skoda Kodiaq 110TSI
11.4m
Worst
Mazda 6e
11.0m · Good

Based on 11.0m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways
Skoda Kodiaq
11.4m · Average

Based on 11.4m turning circle:

  • U-turn on standard street (7m+ wide)
  • Standard parking bay
  • Tight carparks
  • Narrow laneways

Turning circle ratings

Under 10m, Excellent
10 to 11m, Good
11 to 12m, Average
Over 12m, Large

True Cost to Own

Running cost data is not yet available for both models. We will update when figures are confirmed.

Warranty: 5 years / 999,999km (Mazda 6e) vs 7 years / 999,999km (Skoda Kodiaq). The Skoda Kodiaq has longer coverage.

Who Should Buy Which?

Buy the Mazda 6e if: You want the lower entry price, prioritise performance, need more boot space, or prefer Mazda's approach to design and ownership experience.

Buy the Skoda Kodiaq if: You value a longer warranty, need stronger towing, or prefer Skoda's approach to design and ownership experience.

The Verdict

The Mazda 6e takes 5 of 7 key spec categories and comes in at a lower price. If boot space matters, the Mazda 6e has a clear edge. The Skoda Kodiaq adds peace of mind with a longer 7-year warranty. The best pick depends on what you value most. Explore the full specs for each model below.

Common questions

Which is cheapest, Mazda 6e and Skoda Kodiaq?

The Mazda 6e is the cheapest at $49,990 before on-road costs. That undercuts the Skoda Kodiaq by $5,000.

Which is the most fuel-efficient?

The Skoda Kodiaq uses the least fuel at 6.4L/100km on the combined cycle.

Which is safest?

They are evenly matched — Skoda Kodiaq all hold a 5-star ANCAP rating. Compare the active-safety features above to separate them.

Which has the most boot space?

The Mazda 6e has the largest boot at 363L.

Which can tow the most?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the highest braked towing capacity at 2,000kg.

Which has the best warranty?

The Skoda Kodiaq has the longest warranty at 7 years / 1000k km.

Which is the most powerful?

The Mazda 6e makes the most power at 190kW.

Get ahead of your next car

Join free for new-car launches, news, reviews and buying guides. The independent take on what's new in Australia and what's actually worth buying, no dealer spin. Plus early access and founding-member pricing on the upcoming CarSorted Pro Report. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

By subscribing, you agree to receive marketing emails. You can unsubscribe at any time. View our Privacy Policy.

Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (20 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.

Auto-generated from CarSorted's specification data · 20 April 2026

Comments (0)

Sign in to join the conversation

No comments yet. Be the first!

More head-to-heads

Other matchups worth a look

Same segment, similar money. Tap any pair for the full side-by-side spec sheet.

All comparisons

Images are representative. Actual variant trim, colour and equipment may differ.

Browse all cars · All Sedans · All SUVs